The best "teacher" engine to analyze a low rated game

Sort:
kindaspongey
IMBacon  wrote:

… Using an engine to study openings is a waste of your study time and effort.  If you're using them just to see how to play against bad lines as you say, and you enjoy it then it doesn't matter.  But your question also illustrates why you should not use an engines for openings, or study openings right now. Engines do not explain "why"

Isn't it possible that an engine can, in some cases, indirectly explain, by showing how it would play a position? Possibly instructive to see how an engine would continue after

?

EscherehcsE
darwinwasright wrote:
EscherehcsE wrote:
pfren wrote:

Using an engine to learn chess is like using a calculator to learn mathematics.

True. Hopefully, he's only using the engine to spot blunders. He still needs to learn from the traditional sources: books, DVDs, trainers, stronger opponents, etc. (And lots of self-analysis via blood, sweat, and tears...)

said the beginner with extreme authority

...with extreme authority? No, it's just my opinion; If you want to disagree, that's fine. BTW, I AM a patzer, but not really a beginner.

EscherehcsE
darwinwasright wrote:

yeah beginners love giving advice its easier than improving. beginner patzer who cares the skills are the same

Feel free to ask the OP whether you or I have been more helpful to him in this thread.

EscherehcsE
darwinwasright wrote:

yeah you are helpful just keep telling yourself that

 

I actually responded to his original question. I can't seem to find your constructive input, though.

forked_again
darwinwasright wrote:

thats because the question is stupid

You should go away little trolly boy.

Chicken_Monster
dtrasatti wrote:
For what it’s worth, the post match analysis on chess.com is really great. The fact that it is seamlessly integrated makes it easy.

 When you make a mistake or blunder and want to see how it would play out if you made the chess.com move, is there a mechanism for doing that?

forked_again

Yes chicken monster, you can move the pieces according to the suggested computer line or any other move you want to try, and the computer updates the evaluation after every move. You can also click the "finish against the computer"  button which looks like a pawn with a hand on it.  That allows you to play out a game from any position and you have the option of seeing or not seeing the evaluation.  You can choose the computer strength also of course.

HolyCrusader5
darwinwasright wrote:

again, said with extreme authority.  but name-calling. certainly seems to bring an odor of immaturity to your very important opinions

don't act like a god at chess because there are hundreds of thousands of players out there that are better than you

HolyCrusader5

forked_again is considerably better than darwinwasright

aliboron
pfren a écrit :

Using an engine to learn chess is like using a calculator to learn mathematics.

Evidence and at the same time the word of the wise!

HolyCrusader5
darwinwasright wrote:
EscherehcsE wrote:
pfren wrote:

Using an engine to learn chess is like using a calculator to learn mathematics.

True. Hopefully, he's only using the engine to spot blunders. He still needs to learn from the traditional sources: books, DVDs, trainers, stronger opponents, etc. (And lots of self-analysis via blood, sweat, and tears...)

said the beginner with extreme authority

facepalm