two rocks or one queen?
Sort:
mauriga
Oct 6, 2021
0
#21
I’d like to thanks also the other members for the stupid answers to my stupid question 😂
TheRussianPhoenix wrote:
no guys rocks = rook there can't be actual rocks there.
The next thing which may possibly happen is the replacement of pawns with prawns.
Oct 7, 2021
0
#23
eric0022 wrote:
TheRussianPhoenix wrote:
no guys rocks = rook there can't be actual rocks there.
The next thing which may possibly happen is the replacement of pawns with prawns.
and then knight with night
Oct 7, 2021
0
#24
BishopTakesH7 wrote:
Stop making fun of their misspelling, @mauriga just wanted advice to improve.
we're joking bruh
The night took the rock, then the prawn took the night
mauriga wrote:
One more stupid question.
When I analyze a game w/ the internal engine, it suggest me to lose my queen and gain two rocks.
Is this a good deal?
Thanks for your comments.
mau——
When I analyze a game w/ the internal engine, it suggest me to lose my queen and gain two rocks.
Is this a good deal?
Thanks for your comments.
mau——
Generally, Two rooks are slightly better. But, this is not true if a few conditions are met.
1. King is weak. Immediately makes the queen better, as it can attack the king, get tactics, a draw, or whatever.
2. Pawn weaknesses.
3. Far advanced pawns/Pawns on both wings. This makes the queen better.
Basically, in an otherwise equal position, the rooks are better. If not, the queen is better, as most weakness are much more easily taken advantage of.
