What do you think of this game? I tried to play a bit more carefully and definitely used more tactics here. I feel like I must have messed up somehow to allow his queen to get by my king though. I'm playing the black pieces.
Lol watching it back I realized I completely blundered the knight and he ignored it.
Right off the bat the first thing that I noticed was white missing 27.Qg7#. I'm surprised that you didn't play 25.Nxb2 removing that threat that was telegraphed.
Also, on move 2, play 2...Nc6. Threats like 2.Qh5 are easy to defend against by developing your pieces naturally. While 2...Qf6 defends the e-pawn, it gets in the way of placing the king knight on one of its best squares in f6 and removes a potential support piece of a d5 pawn push. You need to try and play against stronger competition who don't rely on threats like this.
My usual move is to develop the knight with an attack on the queen, then block check with the bishop when the queen takes pawn. Then I threaten the queen on the next move bringing out my other knight. This actually hasn't usually ended well for me so I don't do it anymore lol.
What do you think of this game? I tried to play a bit more carefully and definitely used more tactics here. I feel like I must have messed up somehow to allow his queen to get by my king though. I'm playing the black pieces.
Lol watching it back I realized I completely blundered the knight and he ignored it.
Right off the bat the first thing that I noticed was white missing 27.Qg7#. I'm surprised that you didn't play 25.Nxb2 removing that threat that was telegraphed.
Also, on move 2, play 2...Nc6. Threats like 2.Qh5 are easy to defend against by developing your pieces naturally. While 2...Qf6 defends the e-pawn, it gets in the way of placing the king knight on one of its best squares in f6 and removes a potential support piece of a d5 pawn push. You need to try and play against stronger competition who don't rely on threats like this.