13905 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Na5 looks to keep the pawns that are in the center, cramping white, b5 does the same, as for tactical respoces, f5 looks good
I'm not too fond of Na5, since it's not a great square for the knight. f5 looks a little loose. I'd like to defend the pawn with 13...b5
14.a4 is an idea. If black plays 14...a6 than we can play 15.axb5 axb5 16.Rxa8 Qxa8 17.cxd3 and black can't recapture with his queen and after 17...cxd3 it shouldn't be so hard to win that pawn.
go for it, looks sound and after running a few variations in my head, That looks right
I play 14.a4
Sorry, I forgot about the game. I play 14...a6
go for the tactic
I play 15.axb5
His plan is clearly to win the d pawn, so perhaps trading it first with dxc2 is logical?
I was hoping for some kibitzing here, oh well :(. I guess I'll take the game into uncharted waters with 15...dxc2. I see nothing wrong with it, and it trades the d-pawn before it will become extremely weak.
The change in move order looks better than our variation. I'll just take with 16.Qxc2 since it looks pretty much forced. What should be the plan now?
Good idea but axb5 Rae1 Rxg7 and black not only is a pawn up but also is stopping Ng5.
16...axb5 seems forced.
17.Rxa8 and Rad1 are my candidates.
I play 17.Rad1, it has some nice threats
Any help here?
Would you like to call it a draw? No one seems to be interested.
wait I am still here, I was under the impression that you were in an extended exchange
Abandon = no result
My response is normally 2.Nf3 but I am considering 2.Qh5!? to get out of theory very early.
No no no, not the "Parham"! xD
I would play 16...axb5, trading rook, e.g.
Wild Chess Imagery
by ChessPlayinDude47 a few minutes ago
5/28/2016 - [Smyslov - Fischer, Yugoslavia 1959
by shellman211 a few minutes ago
Your games shallowly and pessimistically analyzed by some guy.
by Diakonia 2 minutes ago
hall of fame
by notmtwain 7 minutes ago
Most games played?
by baddogno 10 minutes ago
Jude Acers' Chessmate
by Crappov 13 minutes ago
fundamentalist with an open mind
by the6milliondollarcat 14 minutes ago
5/28/2016 - Overworked and Under Paid
by macer75 24 minutes ago
5/27/2016 - Straight Checks
by BryanCFB 29 minutes ago
Offering a Draw or Accepting a Draw
by ReddyJ 40 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!