Here's a try: 3 1/2 moves
Fun challenge
Nice, thanks for sharing! Not sure if I would have found it; it's clear you need to play on the weak diagonal, but h5 is a tricky move!
It's not over just yet! What's the fastest you can reach a position where the side to move has forced mate in at least FOUR moves?
12 halfmoves for mate in 11...
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f6?! 3. Nxe5?! fxe5? 4. Qh5+ Ke7 5. Qxe5+ Kf7 6. Bc4+ Kg6
There are more examples of players announcing mate in eight after black's seventh move... such things
The challenge is this: figure out how quickly a position can be reached where the side to move has a forced mate in MORE THAN 2 moves. For instance:
Trying my best not to sound green chesswise - and don't bring out the grammar police, seriously, that's not what this is about - please tell me what the significance is in reaching a position that has a forced mate in more than two moves?
should I be seeing that as:
figure out how quickly a position can be reached where the side to move has a forced mate in NO MORE THAN 2 moves.
?
Buggy, you read that correctly...
The whole point of the "more than two moves" part is in the discoverer's ability to deliver a stinging "Mate in x + > 2 moves" statement to his opponent.
The challenge is this: figure out how quickly a position can be reached where the side to move has a forced mate in MORE THAN 2 moves. For instance:
Trying my best not to sound green chesswise - and don't bring out the grammar police, seriously, that's not what this is about - please tell me what the significance is in reaching a position that has a forced mate in more than two moves?
should I be seeing that as:
figure out how quickly a position can be reached where the side to move has a forced mate in NO MORE THAN 2 moves.
?
Well, I guess that's to exclude stuff like fool's mate, and other silly mates in one.
Buggy, you read that correctly...
The whole point of the "more than two moves" part is in the discoverer's ability to deliver a stinging "Mate in x + > 2 moves" statement to his opponent.
Plus, posting fools mate is getting old and tired here.
The challenge is this: figure out how quickly a position can be reached where the side to move has a forced mate in MORE THAN 2 moves. For instance:
Trying my best not to sound green chesswise - and don't bring out the grammar police, seriously, that's not what this is about - please tell me what the significance is in reaching a position that has a forced mate in more than two moves?
should I be seeing that as:
figure out how quickly a position can be reached where the side to move has a forced mate in NO MORE THAN 2 moves.
?
If that was the case, most people would know,without even having to think, the answer was one and a half moves (1.f3 e5 2.g4, and Black has a "forced" mate in one). It's much harder to set up a longer forced mate, which is why that's the challenge: set up a forced mate in at least x moves, in as few legal moves as possible.
In the case of 1.f3 e5 2.g4, black really has no set up at all; white is his own accomplice in setting up that openning which should be called the Kevorkian.
so then are we looking for the fastest forced mates, or quickest to announce?
or are they the same?
They're basically the same, but quickest to announce is what's being counted. So if Black (correctly) announces mate in 4 on move 6, that's 5 1/2 moves, not 9. However, if he can force mate in 3 starting on move 6, it doesn't count at all, because it's not long enough (see post # 7).
The challenge is this: figure out how quickly a position can be reached where the side to move has a forced mate in MORE THAN 2 moves. For instance: