I'm not sure. I'd just start off by suggesting the best openings to weak players
Playing "CHESS" as an under-400 ELO

Lets try to rephrase da question: how exactly do you protect these players?
Aknowledging and calling out the lies deters and disuades the liars and make the u-400 more cautious and self conscious

Perhaps low-rated players annoy you in some other way?
It is a self projection. He doesn't approve being a U-400 himself so its annoying for him witnessing this behaviour in others

> He doesn't approve... so its annoying for him...
Who?
I was talking about @MaestroDelAjedrez2025 , but I think it wouldn't be wrong to say its aplicable to almost everybody

Ok, lets wait for his answer about da self projection
Beware that the majority of people won't admit it because its more confortable for them to believe they are smarter than that. Especially chess players imo

weren't you under 400 at some point? & anyone under 400 still plays chess with the same rules. the only difference is the higher rating the less blunders. it is chess and it will be chess no matter the rating. what do u think they are playing if its not chess then? checkers? to say that anyone below 400 doesn't play chess is what's actually disrespectful, especially cuz the average rating here is 666
I thought its 585?

By now it should be obvious that this guy is just a troll.
@DrSpudnik as a chess.com member for several years, I have witnessed the decay of optimism in the tone of your coments in chess.com forums. I understand that after so many years of reading nonsense its just easier to put on the TROLL etiquette on someone rather than really dissect what the real message is

By now it should be obvious that this guy is just a troll.
@DrSpudnik as a chess.com member for several years, I have witnessed the decay of optimism in the tone of your coments in chess.com forums. I understand that after so many years of reading nonsense its just easier to put on the TROLL etiquette on someone rather than really dissect what the real message is
The message is garbage and the point it belabored. The thread is circling the drain.
What do you mean by rephrasing that question?