I have a great idea!! How to make your opponent blunder.

Sort:
JackRoach

(This is a joke. I would never do this in OTB chess.)

I have a great idea, I can't believe I didn't think of it before! First get into a position where if they have to move a piece, it would be a blunder. For example:

At this moment, if you are black, take your opponent's king and drop it on the floor. Then when they put it back, claim they have to move it due to the touch move rule. 

JackRoach

This is absolutely brilliant. If they say J'adoube, then you can just keep tipping it over, then complain to the arbitrator that they are adjusting it too much. Then keep on tipping their king over (when the arbitrator isn't looking) until the arbitrator makes them do the TM rule. 

Wildekaart

But you touched it too.

Surely if it was allowed someone would've thought of this before and tried it? Where have those stories gone?

JackRoach

There is a first for everything. When someone invented the wheel, did they think: "This is so obvious. You copied from someone."

Moonwarrior_1

Lol

AussieMatey

Hmm. That was wheely dumb . I have spoke n. happy.png

JackRoach
AussieRookie wrote:

Hmm. That was wheely dumb . I have spoke n.

Not if it works.

ReeceJW

What if they get the arbiter to watch your game until the next few moves through, and people will hear the King be moved and knocked over a lot and will see you just knocking their king over like an impotent child, as Lasker said "On the chessboard lies and hypocrisy do not survive long. The creative combination lays bare the presumption of lies; the merciless fact, culmination in checkmate, contradicts the hypocrites." 

sndeww
ReeceJW wrote:

What if they get the arbiter to watch your game until the next few moves through, and people will hear the King be moved and knocked over a lot and will see you just knocking their king over like an impotent child, as Lasker said "On the chessboard lies and hypocrisy do not survive long. The creative combination lays bare the presumption of lies; the merciless fact, culmination in checkmate, contradicts the hypocrites." 

Just do it fast enough nobody can see.

ReeceJW
B1ZMARK wrote:
ReeceJW wrote:

What if they get the arbiter to watch your game until the next few moves through, and people will hear the King be moved and knocked over a lot and will see you just knocking their king over like an impotent child, as Lasker said "On the chessboard lies and hypocrisy do not survive long. The creative combination lays bare the presumption of lies; the merciless fact, culmination in checkmate, contradicts the hypocrites." 

Just do it fast enough nobody can see.

You would still be able to hear it, plus your opponent would obviously be very angry about this

sndeww
ReeceJW wrote:
B1ZMARK wrote:
ReeceJW wrote:

What if they get the arbiter to watch your game until the next few moves through, and people will hear the King be moved and knocked over a lot and will see you just knocking their king over like an impotent child, as Lasker said "On the chessboard lies and hypocrisy do not survive long. The creative combination lays bare the presumption of lies; the merciless fact, culmination in checkmate, contradicts the hypocrites." 

Just do it fast enough nobody can see.

You would still be able to hear it, plus your opponent would obviously be very angry about this

make them deaf and blind first. then it's easy.

ReeceJW
B1ZMARK wrote:
ReeceJW wrote:
B1ZMARK wrote:
ReeceJW wrote:

What if they get the arbiter to watch your game until the next few moves through, and people will hear the King be moved and knocked over a lot and will see you just knocking their king over like an impotent child, as Lasker said "On the chessboard lies and hypocrisy do not survive long. The creative combination lays bare the presumption of lies; the merciless fact, culmination in checkmate, contradicts the hypocrites." 

Just do it fast enough nobody can see.

You would still be able to hear it, plus your opponent would obviously be very angry about this

make them deaf and blind first. then it's easy.

Ah, the classic prison gambit

ReeceJW
Optimissed wrote:

I'd get such a person thrown out of whatever competition it was. As a known idiot, they might find it difficult to be allowed to play again.

I'm fine with people not being super serious, but there is a point where it goes too far

sndeww

quids? Is that the french currency or something?

Dzindo07

Simply genius

sndeww
Tonya_Harding wrote:

A quid is a pound in British English slang, next time Google it.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=quid

 

I would, except I’m too lazy.

Zachachu
This is ok I Gus it was helpful
PunchboxNET
B1ZMARK wrote:

quids? Is that the french currency or something?

The French currency is Euros, same as your country.

snoozyman
Genius
JijoAttumalilJose

I have one more idea: how to make my opponent not to blunder.

All I have to do is to make myself blunder.tongue.png