Illegal Position Contest!

Sort:
Avatar of Chesspro5747
MARattigan wrote:

I wish they'd make them coördinates bigger. I just spent five minutes working on a proof game.

But it's illegal either way up - pretty.

Yeah I usually put white on the bottom, I only occasionally flip the board. Do you see why it’s illegal either way up?

Avatar of Chesspro5747
n9531l1 wrote:
Chesspro5747 wrote:
This position should be illegal. (#8177)

It looks illegal to me. After White retracts Ph7-h8=N#, a retraction by the black rook gives an illegal check, and the black king can only retract into an illegal double check.

That is correct!

Avatar of Chesspro5747
Irritable-Bobcat wrote:

poor white king

Try to make positions that require analysis to prove illegal, one with adjacent kings doesn’t count.

Avatar of n9531l1
fjdkslagh wrote:
#8184

A little too obvious. White has made 10 pawn captures, but all the black units are still on the board.

Avatar of EndgameEnthusiast2357

Illegal with black to move.

Avatar of ChinaseNukeIncoming

this one's gotta be it

Avatar of ChinaseNukeIncoming
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:

Illegal with black to move.

i still can see the bishops are trapped

Avatar of EndgameEnthusiast2357
Avatar of Chesspro5747
ChinaseNukeIncoming wrote:

this one's gotta be it

Still a bit too obvious, how did the pawn on f6 get there?

Avatar of Chesspro5747
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:
 

If it’s white to move it looks legal, last move for black was a capture on h4. Black to move is illegal because he has 6 knights and 4 surviving pawns meaning that white did not have a legal last move since the king would be in an impossible check by the bishop on h4 since nc8 kxc8 is impossible.

Avatar of ChinaseNukeIncoming
Chesspro5747 wrote:
ChinaseNukeIncoming wrote:

this one's gotta be it

Still a bit too obvious, how did the pawn on f6 get there?

through quantum traveling

also the main point (what makes it illegal) is that the rook on e1 drank the invisibility potion (yes, quantum traveling is in chess)

Avatar of Chesspro5747
This position is illegal with either side to move. This is from white’s POV in case anyone can’t see the coordinates.
Avatar of EndgameEnthusiast2357

Because the bishop couldn't get out from c1.

Avatar of Chesspro5747
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:

Because the bishop couldn't get out from c1.

What about a promotion?

Avatar of EndgameEnthusiast2357
Chesspro5747 wrote:
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:

Because the bishop couldn't get out from c1.

What about a promotion?

The bishop on a8 needs to be a promotion for the check to be possible. No other pawns available for promotion (like mine).

Avatar of n9531l1
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:
Chesspro5747 wrote: (#8193)
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:

Because the bishop couldn't get out from c1.

What about a promotion?

The bishop on a8 needs to be a promotion for the check to be possible. No other pawns available for promotion (like mine).

Would it be legal if the c2 pawn were on c3?

Avatar of Chesspro5747
n9531l1 wrote:
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:
Chesspro5747 wrote: (#8193)
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:

Because the bishop couldn't get out from c1.

What about a promotion?

The bishop on a8 needs to be a promotion for the check to be possible. No other pawns available for promotion (like mine).

Would it be legal if the c2 pawn were on c3?

Endgame Enthusiast is correct! Yes it would be, the last move was g2-g3+ and with the pawn on c3 the king can get to h1 legally.

Avatar of EndgameEnthusiast2357

I didn't even think of that aspect, the g pawn couldn't be the last move because with the configuration of the pawns the king could never get to the 1st rank..nice one, combines alot of themes.

Avatar of Chesspro5747
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:

I didn't even think of that aspect, the g pawn couldn't be the last move because with the configuration of the pawns the king could never get to the 1st rank..nice one, combines alot of themes.

Thank you!

Avatar of Chesspro5747
I don’t think the bishop can get outside the pawn wall, hope it’s illegal.