My game Vs IM Henry Steel


Well played. Although I can't understand what went through his mind when he moved 16. Rf3. It was a decisive mistake.

Well played. Although I can't understand what went through his mind when he moved 16. Rf3. It was a decisive mistake.
Really, Rf3?? is a decisive mistake and I have a huge disadvantage.
Here is Hoidini analysis show -0.12 in favour of me, I agree that I went from better to equal, but not a decisive mistake. I agree that Qg5 is a bad move for me, this is Houdini analysis +0.42 in favour of black.
What went through my mind is how to I apply the pressure more, I calculated e5 and f5 looked equal, but are better then Rf3?!
What Qg5? do you mean Qg4?
Unfortunately I don't have a chess engine to check but I was pretty sure Rf3 was his biggest mistake. Look at how Houdini would play vs. Houdini with Rf3 and with e5 instead of Rf3.

The title and most of the discussion was apparently very misleading. First IM Steel was playing Black and won the simul with a score of 6-0 and this was not pointed out.
Also, some people watching this thread thought you won and in fact you lost AND you did not point this out. You really should make an apology.

Lazy, Henry is NOT second best player in the country!
Also, Henry is NOT the 2nd highest rated player in the country and FIDE does NOT say he is.
Lazy, you let people congratulate you as they thought you won and you let it go.
Lazy, in a situation like this, you can undo some of the errors/damage you made by making a little apology and admit what you did wrong which was quite misleading.