Shortest games possible.
Sort:
I never had to worry about anyone attempting it in the past. Now it's like all these low rank players are trying it instead of playing right. It becomes annoying.
Jan 31, 2017
0
#23
I had a quick game just now.... [Site "Chess.com iPhone"]
[Date "01/31/2017 11:55PM"]
[White "Li0nHarrt (579)"]
[Black "Gipsy97 (682)"]
1.e4 c6 2.e5 f6 3.Nf3 fxe5 4.Ng1 g5 5.Qh5# {Li0nHarrt wins by Checkmate}
[Date "01/31/2017 11:55PM"]
[White "Li0nHarrt (579)"]
[Black "Gipsy97 (682)"]
1.e4 c6 2.e5 f6 3.Nf3 fxe5 4.Ng1 g5 5.Qh5# {Li0nHarrt wins by Checkmate}
Lionhart, that's lame. Try playing someone without taking the cheap way out.
Feb 6, 2017
0
#25
LAKnights, the title of this thread is Shortest games possible. What's your point DUMBASS?
Black resigns
one move win
What's my point? Why don't you learn to comprehend, Jerk off.
Feb 10, 2017
0
#28
LAKnights, I am trying to comprehend, Turdface. Challenge me, let's see what you got.
@ZATTT This is an even shorter version:
@Bronzetruck: Yours looks kind of silly to me. I just made one with the same idea, but where seemingly white is playing stupid, which he is in this case. But playing carelessly, in below game as black, and blundering even in positions where you have a clear advantage is always possible. IDK but your short game made me think of mating with a pawn so here it is:
Would not the shortest game of chess possible be: the White player sits down, the Black player sits down, and they agree to a draw? :-) (or lol, your choice)
Hmmmm... when this thread appeared I was only a kid...
like this
