Very Intresting Game
Sort:
To nice played by me
I am pretty sure I have seen something like the same in a chess book before....U could have done 18.0-0-0#.
no way
His so-called 'opponent' doesn't show up in the search members function. Plus, his live chess archive does not show an amazing replica of Lasker's game. Hmmm... wonder what that means...
Very intresting thread...
Maybe "To nice played by me" means "Too nice to have been played by me", in which case the OP is as honest as a fried egg
smiley15 wrote:
Just as a bit more criticism, the third most brilliant move in history was totally mine
Levitsky - Marshall, 1912, if i remember correctly. Yes?
RainbowRising wrote:
The OP is a disgrace to his nationality, who have a solid reputation of being honest and hard working. Shame on you.
Really? Everytime some posts something stupid they disgrace their nation? Do you have any kind of idea the sort of reputational damage that is done here every day!? I'm surprised that anyone, anywhere, can leave their home at this point. If I post something smart do I become a credit to my race?
I guess it's a good thing that there is plenty of disgrace to spread around.
rlian3 wrote:
I am pretty sure I have seen something like the same in a chess book before....U could have done 18.0-0-0#.
I think I remember somehing like this in a blind game Morphy vs amateur with Evans Gambit. It is in "the art of checkmate" (l'art de faire mat) by Renaud / Kahn, but I can't find this book in my mess..
@#10...
Omg...that's a real move played OTB!? Holy schmanoly! That's freaking great! What game is that from? (I'm really bad on games post 1950) ...
Anyone play friends...It's no matter
But It's really nice game
Computer Chess Master Vs. Computer Chess Master(Infinite played by both)
thank u ankitvish: when chessmasters meet together
I think white should focus more on the opening, pawn structure, king safety etc.
qxf4+ is a nice addition