When a "bad" move is better than the "winning" move

Sort:
Avatar of Rozenmarine
This is another great position. White to move.
There's a lingering threat of Ne7, forking the king and winning the rook. However the black knight is protecting that square.
You could just play c4 Rxc4 Re8 ~Kf7 and Nd6 securing the rook advantage.
However, it's not the coolest, therefore my opponent would probably outplay me in the endgame, or I would just win a bad game and get bad reputation.
That's why in this position the best move is Re3. Take a while to think about this move.
My opponent, as he calculated the full variation, blew up like stockfish. He unreasonably played Kf7, clearly allowing himself to be rook down afer Nd6. But then played Kg6, which was a blunder, as after Rg3 Kh6 Nf7 is mate.
Please note that after Re3 Nxe3 is losing for black. I'm not sure how, but my opponent calculated it for me, which is enough.Note: I'm subscribing to the neoromantic style of chess. If you are some weird kind of philister, the best move is obviously just c4, as pure calculation suggests.

Avatar of Chess_Kibitzer_2020

At blitz players do all sorts of crazy things, after Re3 it's obvious that Nxe3 Ne7 king moves Nxc8 then move the knight on e3 possibly back to d5, Nxa7 maybe and Nxc3 and black has an extra pawn but maybe drawn.

Alternatively Re3 Rxc3 and not sure how it goes from there.

c4 looks like the obvious move to me as I fork on e7 if the knight moves and with Re8 then Nd6 if the rook captures the pawn.