700 vs 1000 rated player 93% accuracy

Sort:
sndeww
VonDurkio wrote:
B1ZMARK a écrit :

it says you were black...

Well you can check the game from my profile instead. I had the white pieces maybe it's just bugging.

nevemind, I must have clicked on something else.  I accidentally clicked on the queens gambit game by accident and annotated it and then looked back... Oh well. I guess some help is better than none. 

 

VonDurkio
PrintR a écrit :

Fun fact I’m on mobile as well and commenting here is hell because u can’t do it in the app. Are you sure i’m that hilarious tho? That sounded like you being kinder than you’d have to be just to make me feel a little bit less awkward with my bad puns 🥲

Lmaoo, no that genuinely made me laugh. I really found it funny 😂

VonDurkio
B1ZMARK a écrit :
VonDurkio wrote:
B1ZMARK a écrit :

it says you were black...

Well you can check the game from my profile instead. I had the white pieces maybe it's just bugging.

nevemind, I must have clicked on something else.  I accidentally clicked on the queens gambit game by accident and annotated it and then looked back... Oh well. I guess some help is better than none. 

 

Dang dude, you're the true mvp. Always analyzing games and helping out the community, I appreciate that. Also, this game was like about 2 weeks ago I believe and it really is one of the most terrible games i ever played but eh, we learn from our mistakes. I also picked up an important topic from your analysis which is opening the position while being behind in development, I never heard of that before even though it makes sense now that you told me about it, I'm definitely gonna keep that in mind for my next games. Thanks once again, your explanation was much needed for this game. 👌

sndeww

I’m simply glad you took the time to read it.

pangarsa

'-'

TheZugswanger
IMBacon wrote:

This is a game you can learn from.  Posting speed chess games, concentrating on percentages, and accuracy does NOTHING to improve  your chess.  All it is, is an ego feed.

 

playing speed chess is good if u can play with good cap score. Also u should not talk u play daily games which is rly a completely different thing

sndeww
TheZugswanger wrote:
IMBacon wrote:

This is a game you can learn from.  Posting speed chess games, concentrating on percentages, and accuracy does NOTHING to improve  your chess.  All it is, is an ego feed.

 

playing speed chess is good if u can play with good cap score. Also u should not talk u play daily games which is rly a completely different thing

It doesn’t work that way. You play good speed chess if you play good over the board chess.

IMKeto
TheZugswanger wrote:
IMBacon wrote:

This is a game you can learn from.  Posting speed chess games, concentrating on percentages, and accuracy does NOTHING to improve  your chess.  All it is, is an ego feed.

 

playing speed chess is good if u can play with good cap score. Also u should not talk u play daily games which is rly a completely different thing

A high cap core is not a good indicator of how well someone played.   Lets say you play 24 good moves, and miss a mate in 1.  So you have 24 out of 25 good moves, but still lost. 

And yep...daily chess and speed chess are chess but they are different types of chess. 

Speed chess is fine if youre not serious about improvement, or an already established player.   Obviously everyone is different, and i can only use what i have witnessed to back what im trying to say.  I help run scholastic chess tournaments.  And you can tell immediately who the online speed chess players are, and who the usual OTB tournament players are.  The round will start with a time control of G30, and the speed chess players are still playing like they are playing online.  After about 3-4 minutes they lose, and run right to the laptop to play more speed chess.  The usual OTB players are still playing. 

Rat1960


Four Knights.
The difference between beginner and intermediate is material hanging.
We reach 6. ... Nc6-d4
What was that knight doing? It was defending [e5]
7. Na4, nah 7. Nf3xe5 d6 8. Nd3 (attacking the hanging bishop)

10. ... d6, what that allows is for white to attack Nf6
on a 2 v 1 basis. Could win a pawn.

11. Bg5 Be6 (hoping for BxB by white) 12. BxNf6 ...
Now here black could play the terrible 12. ... BxB
When white would have 13. Qg4 ! g6 14. Qg5 and mating.

11. Bg5 Be6 12. BxN g7xBf6 13. Bb3 and white wins a pawn.

So what really is 11. a3 doing. Why did you play that.
12. b4 and now the whole pawn winning thing is gone.
Now it is use the space with
13. Bg5 Qd8 14. d4 ! sharp to open the centre. 14. ... exd
15. Rad1 when white gets the pawn back and is starting
to remove outposts for the black knight to better work the bishop pair.
Note if black thinks he has 15. ... c5
Then 16. bxc5 dxc5 17. e5 h6 18. BxN gxBf6 19. exf

14. c3, nope 14. d4 as noted above, work the pair.

21. Now what to do here. Rooks to open files or drift both rooks
to the shattered kingside. At your current strength, I think open files.

21. ... b5 dear me don't put your pawns on your bishop colour.
22. Here white can be forcing 22. Bd5 Rb8 23. Re7
23. ... a6 24. Rc1 Bf5 25. Rc1-c7, when all white's pieces are active
and all black's are passive
23. ... Bf5 24. Rxa7 Bxd3 25. Rd1, when white will pick off the d-pawn.
Or the b-pawn that the bishop can attack.
Of course white does not want a bishop swap here as [f7] is killing black
that the bishops and rooks will be hitting.
The game plan, to be fair 22. to 26. works.

27. Rd1, I mean No. Sure black can hit [d3] with RB and white has to defend with RB
but really it is way better to defend actively with
27. Rc1 and Rc3 if black plays Bf5

30. Rc1 ?? Awful, you have 30. Bf3 then d5 and Ke2

45. Rc8+, sure but 45. h4 is a faster draw.

 

Saltyrock12

Very proud to play this game my accuracy was 91.3%