93% Accuracy!!!

Really?

He actually did it

It’s not really your opponent being insanely good , you just made a lot of bad moves that were kind of forcing you him to take stuff … advice would be , don’t play Queen to h4 ! Not that early anyway as g6 means you have to use another move moving your queen and you lose too much time in the opening (Generally any move that makes a threat that your opponent can just block with a pawn immediately isint a good move ) . Control the centre with e4 or d4 , generally knights before bishops , castle , and go on the attack or try gain position from there … 500 is an easy score to improve on so try 15+10min games and make sure you not blundering as much as here and your rating will shoot up

it's POSSIBLE for even low rated players to have brilliant games. I actually beat chessmaster 2000's tal personality on an old PC (it had to be AT LEAST 2000 rated, and I think it was supposed to be 2400) back when I was a lowly 1450 when trying to study

as black trying to figure out how to counter the blackmar diemer gambit (which I actually play now against the scandinavian) and when I saw that it lead to losing castling rights, I said "nah uh! PROVE IT!" and switched sides to see what was so "brilliant" about allowing an opponent to steal castling rights... always a favorite tactic of mine.

i think it was a 30 minute game that ended with me mating the king in the center in something like 37 moves when i think I gained a tempo on "him" with 0-0-0+. I just developed my pieces and attacked in the center.

I also beat a 2200 rated player in 10m back when caissa was still around around the same rating.

it's possible to make brilliant moves by accident

you know he is black right?