A game I analyzed

Sort:
Avatar of ricecake9

This game (and my subsequent analysis) was from December '09.  I was really pro at chess back then.  I wrote this analysis in a blog post to help all the noobs below my level who were struggling at the time--like a beacon of hope; a blinding yet inspiring flashlight of opportunity whose lighting is the result of the dexterous hands of a seasoned master (in this case myself), I hoped to help the seemingly hopeless find a way by which they may overthrow the relentlessly cruel and inhumane masters of chess mediocrity.  However, as a I reenter the realm of chess on this very day (after a long and heart wrought 19-month hiatus), I suspect that I may not be so beast anymore; therefore I presume I am unable to discern as to whether my analysis of this game at the time was accurate and helpful.  This has been a cause of great concern.  If anyone would be so kind as to enlighten me, in the words of the great Plato, mayest thou stepest up?  So as to render upon my heart a more peaceful state, one which is untroubled by petty concerns of my chessducational utility?

Avatar of Zelenkooo

6. d6 is a bad move, you need to develop , cxd6 would be great for black

7. this move just helps black to develope , i would play d6

19. take the knight 

23. Qc3 looks better

28. Bxf6 can lead to mate

37. Kh7 would be possible 

Looks like you are tinking a bit too much about your oponents moves , and not focusing on yours as much