I wasn't surprised that Bronstein and Najdorf, as indicated in Bronstein's annotations, found lines playable alternate to the ones played in this game. I was surprised after I downloaded StockFish and had it analyze this game. It found nothing to comment on until move 38 when White plays Qh4. StockFish's comment:
StockFish (score -6.26 at depth 25) thinks this is not a good move.
StockFish then provides an alternate line that leaves Black with a less decisive advantage and goes on to find a few other moves that it didn't like. Here is the game again with the StockFish analysis (and the Bronstein annotations included as well).
I didn't see any warning against posting games that aren't your own, and I didn't see another forum that would be better than this one to post this question, so here goes. This game is taken from David Bronstein's book, Zurich International Chess Tournament 1953. I've included Bronstein's annotations. My question is in regard to one move in particular; at move 25, I think White could have done better with Rfe1 instead of what was played which was Rde1. If the black queen retreats, White wins the c4 pawn. If the black queen takes the f4 pawn, then White begins a powerful attack with 26. Rd4. Regarding my question, Bronstein has no comment.