i would generally say that when you post a game where you beat somebody to a bloody pulp like you just did, people won't help analyze the game :) people generally help analyze losses, not crushing victories :) those are best for the game showcase :D
Analysis requested
Sort:
Agreed; losses are more instructive than victories. If you have no losses, play stronger opponents, and you will get some soon enough. :)
Not much to say there really! Won by a landslide, and while I probably dont have much more experience than you I dont think you did much wrong at all. Just about the only useful thing I can say is, to delete a variation you have to promote it first to the main variation.
9.Nxh1 would be better in my oppinion but other than that, you did good. Next time post losses so we can help you learn from mistakes
RELee1865 wrote:
9.Nxh1 would be better in my oppinion but other than that, you did good. Next time post losses so we can help you learn from mistakes
Why would that have been better?
I've always read that the treat is in some cases bigger then the power of the attack itself.
I think that if I would have just taken his rook immediately, I would have lost a lot of control, while if I didn't, he had to keep everything together, and there was way more pressure on him.
(I've also posted a loss ^^ - you might analyse that aswell? :D)
Greetz
This was my second third game on www.chess.com (and the first one where I had the clever idea of copying the game (algebraic notation?)
I would like to ask you, people who have way more exp. then me, to analyse my game.
I know that white could have played a much stronger game, but I will have made mistakes aswell (he just wasn't able to exploit them because he didn't see them, nor did I )
What I want from you guys is some pointers as what I should work on, or things I didn't see in this game, mistakes I made, that, if he would have seen it, I would have lost a lot of material/position