all this bullshit is starting to piss me off, how about we resolve this as men should do, would accept a 3 day chess game? I haven't the time to go on about how one of us are wrong for some reason that I've forgotten by now. So what do you say, yes or no?
The fact is you're wrong. How can't you see that?
I'll be more than happy to play a game with you, but what does that have to do with you accusing people of cheating?
Can we get this out of the way, i didin't directly accuse her of cheating, i suggested it could be a group of people.
all this bullshit is starting to piss me off, how about we resolve this as men should do, would accept a 3 day chess game? I haven't the time to go on about how one of us are wrong for some reason that I've forgotten by now. So what do you say, yes or no?
The fact is you're wrong. How can't you see that?
What am i wrong about? The fact that a person can spend 50 hours on chess.com i 2 days as well as sleeping, eating and doing other activities such as a job.
I don't think he was trying to accuse her of cheating. Speculating that she's a guy or a group of guys is unnecessary. :)
I found the Chess Life article.
Black's best is 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6? 3.Nxe5 Qe7 4.Nf3 Qxe4+ 5.Be2
In the game, black missed the best defense of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6? 3.Nxe5 fxe5? 4.Qh5+ Ke7 5.Qxe5+ Kf7 6.Bc4+ d5!
Also in the game, white missed the best continuation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6 3.Nxe5 fxe5? 4.Qh5+ Ke7 5.Qxe5+ Kf7 6.Bc4+ Kg6? 7.Qf5+ Kh6 8.h4!, instead playing 8.d3+ g5 9.h4 which presumably leaves black with some defense after Qe7 or Qe8, both of which protect the weak f7 square. So 10.hxg5+ Kg7, and black is not yet mated and is still up a piece.
I'll be more than happy to play a game with you, but what does that have to do with you accusing people of cheating?
Can we get this out of the way, i didin't directly accuse her of cheating, i suggested it could be a group of people.
I.e. Cheating.
all this bullshit is starting to piss me off, how about we resolve this as men should do, would accept a 3 day chess game? I haven't the time to go on about how one of us are wrong for some reason that I've forgotten by now. So what do you say, yes or no?
The fact is you're wrong. How can't you see that?
What am i wrong about? The fact that a person can spend 50 hours on chess.com i 2 days as well as sleeping, eating and doing other activities such as a job.
It's been explained to you. 3,000 games is actually quite possible with spending a few secs per move.
all this bullshit is starting to piss me off, how about we resolve this as men should do, would accept a 3 day chess game? I haven't the time to go on about how one of us are wrong for some reason that I've forgotten by now. So what do you say, yes or no?
The fact is you're wrong. How can't you see that?
What am i wrong about? The fact that a person can spend 50 hours on chess.com i 2 days as well as sleeping, eating and doing other activities such as a job.
It's been explained to you. 3,000 games is actually quite possible with spending a few secs per move.
And i have explained this too! She don't use 5 seconds!! She would use at least 1 minute, how long would it take you to reply a sensible move in a game?
It should be clear to rational and reasonable people that something is indeed strange with this situation.
I agree, and so i do not accept defeat, but i will not comment no more on this idiotic topic.
That she plays LESS THAN 500 GAMES?
If she spent a minute per game, that's only 8 hours and 20 minutes.
If those are 3days/move games, that means less than 3 hours a day on Chess.com!
i really love watching people rant on chess forums! it makes my day so much better!
i really love watching people rant on chess forums! it makes my day so much better!
me too! I used to just come looking for the arguing threads. Though it's preferable when they're clever.
For the record, one time she had 3500 games, but now the maximum games allowed to play at the same time is reduced to 500-600.
It should be clear to rational and reasonable people that something is indeed strange with this situation.
You know, richie_and_oprah...that is the very thought I have whenever I read your name and see your picture. :P
I just want to say that you did well in your game but you don't have to include Aniko's name in the title or in your diagram.
Aniko's not a group of people. I played 17 games with her and I can tell you she's the same, one and only. She probabaly spends a few seconds per move, and makes frequent blunders. But why all the negativity? I enjoyed my games with her, and we just started another game with a 14 day per move so she can take her time and analyze. By the way, I usually move within 3-5 seconds until things get really hairy. My rating's mid-1600s. I suppose I could be better if I played fewr games slowly. Well, not better, but rated higher. C'est la vie
I just want to say that you did well in your game but you don't have to include Aniko's name in the title or in your diagram.
disagree. I think it's nice to have the player names. lends some veracity to the game too.
all this bullshit is starting to piss me off, how about we resolve this as men should do, would accept a 3 day chess game? I haven't the time to go on about how one of us are wrong for some reason that I've forgotten by now. So what do you say, yes or no?
The fact is you're wrong. How can't you see that?
What am i wrong about? The fact that a person can spend 50 hours on chess.com i 2 days as well as sleeping, eating and doing other activities such as a job.
It's been explained to you. 3,000 games is actually quite possible with spending a few secs per move.
And i have explained this too! She don't use 5 seconds!! She would use at least 1 minute, how long would it take you to reply a sensible move in a game?
I could easily get more than a 1400 rating by taking less than 5 seconds per move. In fact by looking at her games she plays the exact way that I'd expect someone who is rushing to play..
I'll be more than happy to play a game with you, but what does that have to do with you accusing people of cheating?