As everyone will tell you, tactics are important... I have created a few tactical puzzles from your game see if you can solve them!
planing in chess is something that will come with experience, but at your level the best thing you can do is make sure you never miss a tactical opportunity!
Tactics is bedrock of all and any chess plans.
here are some comments on the game itself.
You're better off playing 3.Nc3 than 3.d3. It will serve the same purpose as d3, but you get to develop the knight.
Also, watch out for the situation at 7. .. f5. If you retreat the bishop on that side, (this happens a lot) you'll want to play 8.h3 to give him a place to move back into. Other than that, I don't think there was anything wrong with your attack. Good job!
In game 1, I think you missed a tactical shot: after 5 ...g5 6. Nxg5 fxg5 7. Qh5+ Ke7 8. Bxg5+ Nf6 9. Qh4 Bg7 10. e5
(I seem to have stumbled onto the puzzle! Though I missed the earlier e5 push. Still, it's the looming cheapo sac to get the Q to the h file that jumped out to me in half a second of seeing the position...it's a classic)
Oh, and since Black didn't put ANY pressure on the center on move 1, white could push the issue and play 2. d4 to occupy the whole center and start cramping black's counterplay.
Thanks for the help everyone, I appreciate all the analysis :D
Although I didn't look at the game in any detail, in regards to your comment about not having a plan and just kind of playing move to move looking for tactical opportunities, I would strongly recommend the book Logical Chess Move by Move by Chernev. It is a classic, written something like 50 years ago, and still extreemly useful. It takes 33 master games and goes over them move by move, explaining each move for both side. The annotations are for novice to strong novice level players. I am working through it right now, and its a massive eye opener.
Having said that, never stop working on tactics one way or another. Do puzzles and problems, study tactics books, something. If the tactical skills are not there no other preparation will come to fruition.
dude...u konw wat would help u plan attacks...well anyways....u should play bullet games they help u see a whole bunch of differnet possible attacks fast. Bullet games get u alot better... Nall tat..i think it would be great if u hit a few bullet games...mabe getting ur bullet rating 2 2000s in no time..u would BE great in comin up with some very valuable attacks...at chess i always been inlove with the bullet games N how fast u could plan stuff in a bullet game...but anways try 2 make ur goal this year 2 get ur awsome bullet rating 2 2000s N u would be great at forming plan...believe me its not tat hard 2 get ur bullet rating 2 2000s wats hard is 2 get higher than 2000s...o_O tats were it gets realy hard..but anyways...try 2 make ur goal this year 2 get a bullet rating of 2000s! tat would be awsome...
1 good thing bout being good bout bullets is tat u wouldnt hang peices anymore N u would c lame tactics like a knight for a a queen trap N tat stuff a lot faster tan u would imagine...so a good greAT Wat way 2 get good at forming plans is 2 play more bullets :D welll...anyways i played bout 3000s bullet games...started out with a bullet rating of 900s N before u know it im at 1950s in bullets now. so pround of my self lol. well anways tat wat i got 2 say bout bullet. Chess is just bout practice... N all tat all u got 2 do is practice playing some chess...u would be great..the more u practice chess..the better u get...u just got 2 realy like chess 2 get good at it. :D hahahahah well anyways i wrot a realy good bullet blog if u would like 2 read it BLOG unfurtunatly i should of made the bullet bLog into the thing u made now...lol watever its a blog... hope u check it out. tell me if u like the blog...N 1 more thing good luk in forming plans!
i think its a realy good blog cause it got a great name ! N it got like..um 15 comments for 300 veiws N its a blog! :D got a very good name 2 best blog i wrot at chess. com hope u like it http://blog.chess.com/jokerman13/the-eye-of-a-bullet
here i would post a positions of wat plans R
white
whites whole goal in this game is 2 weaken the power of the black square for black...N he mabe wants 2 keep strong control of the center..black mabe has other plans but im just determining in the first 3 moves of the game..there plan of the WHOLE game so it shouldnt be tat hard 2 come up with very aggresive plans...in a game...
thanx for reading my blog i wrot bout plans in a game...
CHam mabe we could become friends...some time N i could teach u some better chess at live chess. :D
Regarding Jokerman's advice i would disagree with 90% of it.
1) I dont think Bullet chess has anything to do with planning. Bullet is about how 'intuitive' you are. I.e. it is how well you can play chess without thinking. any 'plan' you come up with will be basic.
2) getting to 2000 bullet is not something that can be achieved quickly. Playing bullet well requires (a) speed, and (b) positional understanding. The latter of which takes many hours of playing chess at longer time controls to develop.
3) I float between 19-2100 bullet rating here, and in my games, I'll hang pieces frequently. thus i dont think bullet is a good way of learning to avoid hanging peices.
Telling someone that bullet games will help with plan development is delusional. The only thing you can "learn" from bullet is how fast you can click a mouse. If you are lower-rated and/or a beginner, you need to take time to plan and look at the position. The faster the chess, the more worthless as a learning device.
I tend to agree. The value of bullet/blitz is mostly entertainment. Some people find it fun, and that's fine, but I don't think it has significant training value. To improve at chess you do want to play as much as you can, but play longer time controls, like G25 or longer, so you actually have some time think about what you are doing and try to deepen your understanding. Very fast time controls might be fun, but they won't help you get better. Some tactical problems, a good novice book, and some longer time controls will.
P.S. Jokerman, do you have something against the letter "h"? The words what and that both contain one. If you are going to write a blog as you mentioned you might try to get a grip on spelling one syllable words and not using numbers in the place of letters.
I suspect the crummy spelling and number-words indicate that our jokerman13 is a kid. The grammar and spelling on his home page are attrocious.
Attacks shouldn't be planned, they should be prepared by activating all dormant pieces first (some people call it development)
Btw I hate attrocious spelling as well
im dissapointed tat all u guys here. disslike my amount of spelling mistakes N grammer mistakes 2 be honest with u guys i never realy exceled very well with grammer. i never liked grammer infact. I hated words...N all that but i do like math. N more commplicated stuff. like tat. i realy express my self by talking. yes...i might say stuff i little incorrectly but yet im a great teach at chess. i ave 5 student in real life. im FREE teacher. i also teach a lot of people below the standard rating of 1000s. trying 2 teach em better techuiques of chess...etc. YET people still hang peices. the biggest problem im having with these um...1000 N below R tat the hang peices witch tends 2 be the biggest problem bout. THEM. wen i look at Cham's game i c innauraties , mistakes N blundars D: but... u would get more used 2 the positions tat u R playing if u play bullet chess. Yet i do c some positive play with tactics wat i learned bout chess over the months...R tat..
level 1. dont hang peices. ( bullet play could get u here pritty fast )
level 2. find tactics ( standard play )
level 3. positional play. ( bullet , bliz , standard play )
level 4. Master play. ( standard play )
p.s sorry bout all the spelling N grammar mistakes u find N get ennoyed of sooo easily im just trying 2 express myself lol. guz....
I really don't mean to be too much of a stickler on this point, but a lot of what you write is difficult to understand easily. This violates the basic point of written communication: that someone else can pick it up and read it, decode the text and understand what was meant.
Strings of rebuses and words like "innauraties" can detract from whatever it is you are trying to get across. You may have something to say, but if people are left wondering what you are saying and laughing at your efforts, it is all in vain.
And what does "guz..." mean? 
Even I know what guz means. Guz...
I hadn't even read anything of this thread before I made the atrocious comment. I did that just to echo your apparent joke
I really don't mean to be too much of a stickler on this point, but a lot of what you write is difficult to understand easily.
And it is easy to understand difficultly.
I really don't mean to be too much of a stickler on this point, but a lot of what you write is difficult to understand easily.
And it is easy to understand difficultly.
Expetchally after a few beers. 
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
