So giving away the bishop for no reason is a brilliant move now!
Brilliant Moves in New Game Analysis Report
Sort:
hikarunaku schreef:JalaalSuify wrote:hikarunaku wrote:Brilliant move is the best move which the engine can find only after certain depth is reached. So it is difficult to find for the engine.
You are exactly right.
But if the engine finds it, it is assessed as best. It cannot be assessed as "Brilliant".
Correct me if I am wrong. Have you ever seen the engine proposes a "Brilliant" move as "Brilliant" or as "Best"? I believe NEVER.
If the engine says "Brilliant", it means "I could not find it myself"
Did not previously feel the need to correct this but let me point out why you are wrong since few people still do not understand:
Brilliant move is the best move in the position.
Engine classifies it as brilliant and not as best move since it evaluated it to be the best move after certain depth was reached before that it was not the first choice of engine.
Engine does find the brilliant move by itself but only above a certain higher depth.
It could work like that, but there is an alternative way to implement 'brilliant' move:
A move is brilliant if the engine doesn't think the move is best before the move is played at a certain depth. But after it is played when the engine analyzes the next move at the same depth, it'll figure out in hindsight that the previous move was better. The evaluation of the position changes significantly in that player's favor.
And yes this is a useless discussion.
A brilliant move is the best move in the position. Normally, it would be a sacrifice or a move that would put a piece into a way better position. It can also be a really strong tactic that you found.
he was not that good
broo those guys suck
were they doing copycat?
and everyone would have seen the checkmate
Cornfed wrote:
alexlehrersh wrote:
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/90196195837?tab=review&move=61
why the heck is Qxc3 a brilliant move? I lose faith in this stupid engine
It deserves it well enough for the level of player - easily the best move and Black gets mate in 2 if White takes.
No bro thats actually a nasty tactic..
Feb 20, 2025
0
#751
deniaslwp wrote:
Cornfed wrote:
alexlehrersh wrote:
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/90196195837?tab=review&move=61
why the heck is Qxc3 a brilliant move? I lose faith in this stupid engine
It deserves it well enough for the level of player - easily the best move and Black gets mate in 2 if White takes.
No bro thats actually a nasty tactic..
Agreed
Just click "show" and then you can see why it is brilliant
Apr 2, 2025
0
#756
Actually I got a game with 2 brilliants against Coach-Monica, but I lost it!
Apr 2, 2025
0
#757
https://www.chess.com/analysis/library/52fJvpXUmt?tab=analysis
this one was a queen sack followed by 2 grandmaster-styled greats!!!
bastonje wrote:
Just click "show" and then you can see why it is brilliant
where is the "show" button
NootIsCool wrote:
you missed mate. why you posted it?
bruh yeah doesn't sound brilliant more like a blunder