Brilliant Moves in New Game Analysis Report

Sort:
KentonOfficial

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/22741797793

istoleurfood

once i played a brilliant move, but its just taking a pawn...

zempliq

I think it will be assessed as brilliant if engine think that move is better than the move that itself assessed as the best one

ParadisiacalUndressing

It seems that a definitive consensus has yet to be reached as to what empirically defines a “brilliant move”. This thread is primarily conjecture, educated guess-work and egoist defensiveness. BUT what I think we can ALL reach a consensus on is that “hikarunaku” is the most obnoxiously abrasive, pedantic pontificator I have ever had the displeasure of encountering. It is a testament to this communities maturity that this man was not chased off the thread with torches and pitchforks. I commend you all.

classicchessboy

bruh

Minerfhfhfh

Brilliant moves are where the engine think it's even better than a best move or that you moved a very good move without the engine knowing it or finding it.

CheetahChess777

Hey, in one of my games I got a move the engine couldn't find but it wasn't marked as brilliant.Why??

Goyael

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/21024052229 Who knows why this is a brilliant move

Phlox

Chess.com seems to have added a "Great Find" move category with a single exclamation mark (!) with a light blue color in addition to "Brilliant" Moves with a double exclam (!!).

Goyael
Phlox wrote:

Chess.com seems to have added a "Great Find" move category with a single exclamation mark (!) with a light blue color in addition to "Brilliant" Moves with a double exclamation mark (!!).

Look at my analysis not in Beta mode.

Aiden1500

ok

 

9cNolan
Brilliant moves just happen when you make a top engine move that’s stupid. The computer is just grateful to not be alone.
ChessChamp720


My opponent did two brilliant moves in a row. But both were bad

leroykincaid

Hi

Have been trying to figure out why d5 was a (!!) .. seemed to be just capitalisation on opponent's weak move previously .. unless I'm missing something deeper ?

Rgds

 

 

tcferg

I've only had one move marked as brilliant by the post-game analysis.  In that situation, I was in check and only had 2 legal moves.  I chose the better of the 2 (which seemed fairly obvious) and the analysis called it "brilliant".  I found that really surprising.  Perhaps just a bug? 

GlutesChess

It's usually a move that is hard to find, like a queen sacrifice. OR, it's a move that is considered brilliant because it allows a great play afterwards, but if you don't find the play as well it usually becomes bad.

Like me in the Stafford.

Bid
CheetahChess777 wrote:

Hey, in one of my games I got a move the engine couldn't find but it wasn't marked as brilliant.Why??

Because Brilliant Moves is basically the only move that saves your position

Bid
tcferg wrote:

I've only had one move marked as brilliant by the post-game analysis.  In that situation, I was in check and only had 2 legal moves.  I chose the better of the 2 (which seemed fairly obvious) and the analysis called it "brilliant".  I found that really surprising.  Perhaps just a bug? 

maybe because it was the only one that saved your position

Goyael
silverrook05 wrote:
Brilliant moves just happen when you make a top engine move that’s stupid. The computer is just grateful to not be alone.

What

doodledos

Came here because I was curious but what I found was a comment fight..