once i played a brilliant move, but its just taking a pawn...
Brilliant Moves in New Game Analysis Report
Sort:
I think it will be assessed as brilliant if engine think that move is better than the move that itself assessed as the best one
It seems that a definitive consensus has yet to be reached as to what empirically defines a “brilliant move”. This thread is primarily conjecture, educated guess-work and egoist defensiveness. BUT what I think we can ALL reach a consensus on is that “hikarunaku” is the most obnoxiously abrasive, pedantic pontificator I have ever had the displeasure of encountering. It is a testament to this communities maturity that this man was not chased off the thread with torches and pitchforks. I commend you all.
Sep 13, 2021
0
#346
Brilliant moves are where the engine think it's even better than a best move or that you moved a very good move without the engine knowing it or finding it.
Hey, in one of my games I got a move the engine couldn't find but it wasn't marked as brilliant.Why??
Sep 29, 2021
0
#348
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/21024052229 Who knows why this is a brilliant move
Chess.com seems to have added a "Great Find" move category with a single exclamation mark (!) with a light blue color in addition to "Brilliant" Moves with a double exclam (!!).
Sep 30, 2021
0
#350
Phlox wrote:
Chess.com seems to have added a "Great Find" move category with a single exclamation mark (!) with a light blue color in addition to "Brilliant" Moves with a double exclamation mark (!!).
Look at my analysis not in Beta mode.
Brilliant moves just happen when you make a top engine move that’s stupid. The computer is just grateful to not be alone.
Oct 1, 2021
0
#354
Hi
Have been trying to figure out why d5 was a (!!) .. seemed to be just capitalisation on opponent's weak move previously .. unless I'm missing something deeper ?
Rgds
I've only had one move marked as brilliant by the post-game analysis. In that situation, I was in check and only had 2 legal moves. I chose the better of the 2 (which seemed fairly obvious) and the analysis called it "brilliant". I found that really surprising. Perhaps just a bug?
Oct 1, 2021
0
#356
It's usually a move that is hard to find, like a queen sacrifice. OR, it's a move that is considered brilliant because it allows a great play afterwards, but if you don't find the play as well it usually becomes bad.
Like me in the Stafford.
CheetahChess777 wrote:
Hey, in one of my games I got a move the engine couldn't find but it wasn't marked as brilliant.Why??
Because Brilliant Moves is basically the only move that saves your position
tcferg wrote:
I've only had one move marked as brilliant by the post-game analysis. In that situation, I was in check and only had 2 legal moves. I chose the better of the 2 (which seemed fairly obvious) and the analysis called it "brilliant". I found that really surprising. Perhaps just a bug?
maybe because it was the only one that saved your position
Oct 3, 2021
0
#359
silverrook05 wrote:
Brilliant moves just happen when you make a top engine move that’s stupid. The computer is just grateful to not be alone.
What
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/22741797793