Brilliant Moves in New Game Analysis Report

Sort:
Cornfed
alexlehrersh wrote:

Chess.coms analysis is proven again to be completly useless

Lxg6 is defintiv not briliant

By the definition of what we have read of how something is considered 'brilliant', perhaps it is. To me...no, but perhaps the programmers consider 1700 weak enough to merit giving it a '!!'?

There are books written on 'brilliant play' in chess...the definition varies.

MagnusHenryT

Yes, a brilliant move means that the engine either took to long to find it or it didn't find it at all. A brilliant move waves the game's sides heavily.

deniaslwp
GeographicBoy wrote:
 

bro send this game review!! grin.pnggrin.pnggrin.pnggrin.png:

GeographicBoy
deniaslwp wrote:
GeographicBoy wrote:
 

bro send this game review!! :

No problem

GeographicBoy

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/498538749?tab=review

BaTuan2002

wow

Flaction

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/75139283201?tab=review

is the last move before checkmate considered a sacrifice?

Flaction

thanks : )

MrPotato8428

My friend and I decided to do a game where we blunder a lot of pieces and I accidently got a brilliant.

Han32K

Sure buddy wheres the proof?

evanl_17

I'm just saying, either way, both are good moves and improve your accuracy. Though, would you still have 100% accuracy with best moves AND brilliants?

TotoyKolokoy69

Sac

Han32K

?

VenemousViper

I think a brilliant move is a "Great Move" that's hard to find, or just any sacrifice.

GeographicBoy
Hiqirri wrote:

?

it is gothamchess

Han32K

Yee

Han32K

Han32K

Han32K

Han32K