thats like 1 rated player rating
Brilliant Moves in New Game Analysis Report
Sort:
Mar 9, 2024
0
#683
ferrari201 wrote:
thats like 1 rated player rating
Did Mommy give you a cookie for finding it?
okay
NOBODY CARES
This still going? Nhaha Brrrrillliant! who would have thought that a few pages ago 
NOICE
whhhhhhat
i just watched stockfish 16 play 3 brilliant moves in a row
stockfish 16 is like the newest stockfish
its ELO is 4050 and it beat Mittens
maxorc_23 wrote:
I also don't know what's the difference between the best and brilliant move. I also can't think what's better between them.
Youre move is brilliant because g5 traps the bishop but you have Bxg5!! and then after fxg5,Qxg5+ you fork the opponent rook and king
these are 2 of my brilliant moves, sacs
brrrrraehoeruiwesurosurasubw3eawv9bwq9ov599w3t8y43e5ybwwyt87vwyib45cwy3i4dcwtiw3tu4c7tqjb33crfbyu3g
birlant iz yes yes yes
Phlox wrote:
I have been wondering what defines a "Brilliant Move" rather than just a "Best Move" in the new game analysis report ( https://www.chess.com/news/view/improvers-rejoice-new-analysis-feature-is-now-in-beta ).
From my own games,
18. f4 is marked as a "brilliant move" in https://www.chess.com/a/qtjk2dMg44. Kc6 in https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/34676643792 back-to-back "brilliant moves" 19. exf6 and 20. Rfe1 in https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/3476510047
whenever iclickon the link, it shows that there r 0 brillant moves, instead they r all great moves
I would not have anticipated marking any of these moves as particularly brilliant or surprising (though 20. Rfe1 comes closest), so why are they singled out? It cannot be simply a large evaluation difference as capturing a blundered queen does not get marked as a brilliant move. Any ideas? What "brilliant moves" have you found?
thats so easy to notice