Forums
Most Recent
- 4/21/2018 - Pogosjants, 1970
- Will computers ever solve chess?
- Deep Analysis for Free!
- 80% of people are engine users in chess.com
- Is it true that american players never experience chess.com lag in bullet chess
- My Rematch Request Was Rejected!
- Event Chess Game (Waredude - thegreatauk)
- 4-Player Bulldog Chess: WareDude and HorribleTomato Versus SuperSam1 and Fly_Eagles_Fly
- Why Is the Rook so Short?
- Bulldog Chess with Time Thief, Hunter, Crippled Amazons (HorusTheThird vs Fly-Eagles-Fly)
Forum Legend
- Following
- New Comments
- Locked Topic
- Pinned Topic
This is a game that I've played recently. When I received the results of the computer analysis, I was very confused. First at move 15, I pursued material advantage over moving Rd1, and computer calls it a mistake. Then at move 18, I moved Rd1 instead of pursuing material advantage with Bxb7. And computer calls that a mistake too. I can't tell if my timing was wrong or the computer is just kidding me around, please help.
And the best part is when the analyzer says '(Mat +01, the play might have continued)' after checkmate![Cool]( "Cool")
I don't know what the computer uses to determine its "best" moves and pieve evaluations. Here is a position from one of my recent games (I was Black).
The computer said that White has an 89.04 point advantage. This position is a theoretical draw!
I don't understand. When I play against myself I always lose with black in this theoretical draw situation, could anyone please send a diagram for me?
8...Ka1 is the drawing pattern. If Qxc2 it's stalemate.