Did I do good?


Here is a very plausable variation that could be played. Please note that Black's position looks dire indeed.

I see what I did wrong thoe, after the sequence I put up, I did attack the bishop with a pawn, but then procided to devlop pieces instead of attacking some more. I did end up wining the game, but at least now I realise I did bad.

There are plenty of positions that involve the "sacrifice" of the bishop and knight for the f2 (or f7) pawn and the rook in order to open up the king are very playable. The Open version of the Ruy Lopez with Bc5 variations come to mind.
The advantage in the current game is that white can mobilize an avalanche of pawns and smother black before he can mobilize. Even in the variation I published above, if black plays 13...Qe4, the best he can try for, it looks like a position I would like to try for.

I would like to know if I played good trading my knight and my bishop for his pawn and rook (if its recommended or not) and also, if theres a name to the way he oppened (so i can do some research) and if I could have took advantage of it in some other way. I did not know what to do so I copied his move. Thats all...