Dzindzichashvili vs. Fritz 1991

Sort:
Avatar of ChessboardAbs

Just thought this game was interesting.
Avatar of Natalia_Pogonina

Good old times when humans could beat engines

Avatar of ChessboardAbs
Natalia_Pogonina wrote:

Good old times when humans could beat engines


Amen.

Avatar of heinzie

27. Qxg7#, missing mate in one is unforgivable.

Avatar of gorgeous_vulture
LisaV wrote:

I was trying, and then he/it got booted off chess.com.  lol 

Wish I could play half as well as that....


I fear this was written in one of your less lucid moments Ms V Laughing I was about to ask what you were trying to do, and to whom, that got he/it booted off chess.com ... then remembered the danger of asking such questions!

Avatar of pdela
NickYoung5 wrote:
LisaV wrote:

I was trying, and then he/it got booted off chess.com.  lol 

Wish I could play half as well as that....


I fear this was written in one of your less lucid moments Ms V I was about to ask what you were trying to do, and to whom, that got he/it booted off chess.com ... then remembered the danger of asking such questions!


what are you meaning, guy?

Avatar of gorgeous_vulture

Haha, yes accidental deconstructionism! I could not quite work out who had got booted off and what you were trying to do

Avatar of pdela
any opinion about the game?
Avatar of ImaBullet

Lol 27.Qxg7 is checkmate why didnt he go for the quickest mate?

Avatar of gorgeous_vulture
pdela wrote:
any opinion about the game?

24. ... d3 seemed an odd move for Fritz. Something like Bd7 would have seemed saner

Avatar of gorgeous_vulture
heinzie wrote:

27. Qxg7#, missing mate in one is unforgivable.


Didn't Kasparov miss mate in 2 against some more recent silicon monstrosity? TBH I find it a little heartening that even GMs do it

Avatar of ChessboardAbs
NickYoung5 wrote:
heinzie wrote:

27. Qxg7#, missing mate in one is unforgivable.


Didn't Kasparov miss mate in 2 against some more recent silicon monstrosity? TBH I find it a little heartening that even GMs do it


I don't know about that but I know Kramnik lost one a few years back because he missed that the computer had a mate in one. That was a sad day.

Avatar of heinzie

Kramnik walked into mate in one, but that's not what I said. It is unforgivable to face a position in which you are offered the possibility to mate in one and you fail to do it

Avatar of Math0t
heinzie wrote:

27. Qxg7#, missing mate in one is unforgivable.


oops, did not read well (comment deleted)

Avatar of ChessboardAbs
heinzie wrote:

Kramnik walked into mate in one, but that's not what I said. It is unforgivable to face a position in which you are offered the possibility to mate in one and you fail to do it


I know what you said, I was responding more to the guy who had quoted you rather than you. I agree with you for the record.

Avatar of heinzie

Yes I replied to the comment before yours, you posted in the meantime (accidentally about Kramnik as well)

Avatar of Deranged

Is this the original version of Fritz? The version I have never plays that badly against me!

Avatar of ChessboardAbs
Deranged wrote:

Is this the original version of Fritz? The version I have never plays that badly against me!


I'm uncertain of which version it is but you'll have to take into consideration that the game itself is from 1991, so it clearly isn't whichever version you're using. At least I hope not.