engine analysis more humane

I built a chess analysis tool focused on human reasoning instead of just engine lines. Most analysis tools tell you what the best move is, but not how humans actually think about the move. So I built a platform where players can annotate moves with explanations like: • “This move fixes the weak dark squares” • “I traded because my knight was worse than the bishop” • “I completely missed the back-rank weakness here” Other users can upvote or downvote annotations so the best explanations rise to the top. The goal is to build a community knowledge base of human chess reasoning — not just engine evaluations. I’m especially curious: What makes a chess explanation genuinely useful to you? Do human explanations help you more than engine lines? Would you use something like this for studying? Would love feedback from you guys.

u can check it out at:

"chessdecoded.vercel.app"

Did you use ai or python?