first game analysis request, would love annotation!

Sort:
Avatar of GZADAGENIUS

hey this is a game i recently played as black, it was agaisnt someone with a rating in the 1200's while I was just around a 758 so i am pretty excited although i got lucky when he made a fatal move.  I would love any one who could provide annotation and/or game analysis on how i could have done better especially in the end game.... thank you!

Avatar of calvinhobbesliker
he should have taken your pawn on move 5, you should have taken his knight on move 25, he should've exchanged rooks on move 32, Ne7+ was a mistake
Avatar of Daemon_Panda

You should have castled earlier and protected your e5 pawn.

You could have played 7... Bxf3, bishops are worth the same as knights and knights are more useful in openings and middle game. So trading his knight for your bishop would have been a good idea. It would also open up his king protection or forced his queen into the open.

He should have played 8. c4 moving your bishop back

the next few moves seem sloppy but I don't have an explanation as to why.

Maybe Batgirl will help if you ask her. (I'm talking about the chess.com member)

14... Bxf2+ was a waste, you should have traded knight for bishop earlier

why not 25...Nxd7

29... Qg6 would have protected your knight

I liked your plan with 33... Rb2+ but you had no backup for what he played

but nice turn around

Avatar of GZADAGENIUS
thanks for the comments, looking back i cant believe i completely spaced 25. Nxd7, but hey im new at this
Avatar of Guest0165049333
Please Sign Up to comment.

If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.