You don't have to see through any moves all you have to see is 1:
1)The bishop is getting trapped
2) If a3 is played, they have Ba6
3) if c3 is played Ba6 issue is resolved with Re1
4) With a3 Re1 is not possible
You don't have to see through any moves all you have to see is 1:
1)The bishop is getting trapped
2) If a3 is played, they have Ba6
3) if c3 is played Ba6 issue is resolved with Re1
4) With a3 Re1 is not possible
You don't have to see through any moves all you have to see is 1:
1)The bishop is getting trapped
2) If a3 is played, they have Ba6
3) if c3 is played Ba6 issue is resolved with Re1
4) With a3 Re1 is not possible
The bishop could get trapped, with a3 it isn't.
The Ba6 issue can be dealt with the same way as far as I see it.
Re1 is possible with a3. I don't see how it is impossible. Bishop goes to c5.
You don't have to see through any moves all you have to see is 1:
1)The bishop is getting trapped
2) If a3 is played, they have Ba6
3) if c3 is played Ba6 issue is resolved with Re1
4) With a3 Re1 is not possible
I agree with this, we have two moves for attacking the bishop, if we play a3, black has Ba6! counterplay. With c3, Ba6 is pointless because of Re1.
Yes but you aren't really calculating, it's much simpler in this case.
You see the line you pointed out and then you consider a3, you see that in the a3 line they have Ba6, you see that it's too complicated, you stop, and you decide that c3 is a simpler win. So you play c3
The implies you are calculating moves out. Please give a number, if different, like samsajwani123 did.
Hey, as I said that it is 3-4 moves, but it is NOT NECESSARY to calculate 3-4 moves for EVERY move you play. Sometimes it can happen that there is only one winning move and you have to play it, and sometimes you have many good moves
I don't know why you are replying to someone else's comment I replied to. I replied to you with a different post. Look at who I quoted. (unless you are the same person under 2 accounts)
As you said mentioning that I gave a numeric response, I am quoting that statement, which you made, i.e. The implies you are calculating moves out. Please give a number, if different, like samsajwani123 did.
Bc5 doesn't have to be played, we play Ba6 counter acting the knight on e2 when the rook still can't go to e1. At this point why wouldn't you play the simple c3 without any complications?
As you said mentioning that I gave a numeric response, I am quoting that statement, which you made, i.e. The implies you are calculating moves out. Please give a number, if different, like samsajwani123 did.
That was not for you to reply to. Do you see I talked to a third person and referenced you to them? Look at current post #37. That one was directed at you.
Bc5 doesn't have to be played, we play Ba6 counter acting the knight on e2 when the rook still can't go to e1. At this point why wouldn't you play the simple c3 without any complications?
But you do play Re1.
Bc5 doesn't have to be played, we play Ba6 counter acting the knight on e2 when the rook still can't go to e1. At this point why wouldn't you play the simple c3 without any complications?
But you do play Re1.
So here you traded your opponents bishop for your knight, this is a fair trade therefore you are not winning
Bc5 doesn't have to be played, we play Ba6 counter acting the knight on e2 when the rook still can't go to e1. At this point why wouldn't you play the simple c3 without any complications?
But you do play Re1.
So here you traded your opponents bishop for your knight, this is a fair trade therefore you are not winning
Yes, if I had a computer engine with me when playing, I wouldn't have done that. However, since I don't use assistance when playing I have to resort to something else to decide moves. This involves playing out several lines and choosing the one I think is best.
In the game, my thinking was not about Ba6. It was to get the DSB and I thought possibly trading in the center. The big hangup for me was that I was thinking of playing c4 after the DSB trap attempt. So, c3 never came into the picture at the time. My thinking was why c3 if I could just play c4 and save a move.
"I didn;t see Ba6" this is not an excuse you have to look for checks captures attacks otherwise it won't work
"I didn;t see Ba6" this is not an excuse you have to look for checks captures attacks otherwise it won't work
There, finally got it out of you. How many moves deep would you need to calculate?
No, you won't get me to argue with you again, it's a bad trolling attempt otherwise you wouldn't be reviving two hours later with the same dumb question
And to move on, I am making a new account. I will change this account name in honor of this thread. I welcome and appreciate all comments on this question of how many moves deep you would need. I am unblocking anyone blocked. They can comment.
I'm confused. What were you trying to get out of @chamo2074? You don't sound very nice.
My new nickname will indicate this which is the same I have been "reviving".
But c3 is better. We already said why. Stop arguing that a3 is better.
I thought I saw a line which gave similar advantage, 3 vs. 4. Even with that you are still correct c3 is better. I am not disputing which is better. I am asking how many moves to make the decision. If the line I was thinking comes up again, I'll post it.
Yes but you aren't really calculating, it's much simpler in this case.
You see the line you pointed out and then you consider a3, you see that in the a3 line they have Ba6, you see that it's too complicated, you stop, and you decide that c3 is a simpler win. So you play c3
The implies you are calculating moves out. Please give a number, if different, like samsajwani123 did.
Hey, as I said that it is 3-4 moves, but it is NOT NECESSARY to calculate 3-4 moves for EVERY move you play. Sometimes it can happen that there is only one winning move and you have to play it, and sometimes you have many good moves