Game Analysis for 1400 and below players FREE!

Good! I see you know opening theory. I personally do not like the wiener variation in the french defence(I think thats how it is spelled) I like the tarrasch variation but everyone has their view. If you have not watched videos on the wiener then do so. There is one line that is worth knowing. Nxf6 doesn't llok right. I understand your choice but keep this in mind. After move 5.Bg5 Be7 white can even play move 6. Nxf6. If 6.Bxf6 then 7.Bxf6! and if gxf6 then Bh6! White doesn't retreat the bishop. In most french lines white tries to trade thier dark bishop for blacks strong bishop(thier dark bishop) leaving them with a good bishop on f1 versus the bad bishop on c8. Then a simple plan would be trade the queens and the knights and come to a endgame where you have a good bishop against a bad bishop. Watch GM meliks videos on restricting pieces and GM bojkovs videos on empty bishops. You can find these in the intermediate study plan strategy section 4. I am only telling you YOUR mistakes and ideas. There is no use in telling you where your opponent needs to improve. You say you dont mind isolated pawns. I believe IM daniel rensch has some good videos on isolated queen pawns that you would like. I like move 10.Re1! It is a natural move that has no obvious draw back. The annotions are nice becasue I can see what you were thinking. Move 15.Bh6 is okay. The plan is good but there are better ways to get the c1 bishop to e5. Move 15. Bg5 is tricky with the idea Bxh7! For example Move 15. for black could be b6 trying to play Bb7. Then we see 16.Bxh7! Qxd1 17.Rxd1 and then if Rxh7? White plays Rd8# and if on move 15 plays Bd7 instead we see Bf6 and then Be5. This is better because it is vicous but there is one better move. I showed 15.Bg5 because I love tactics and I couldn't resist showing it but even stronger is move 15.Qg4!! I know it looks like black gets somthing with 15.e5 creating a discovered attck on the queen but then 16.Qg7! attacking the rook on h8 and the pawn on e5. No response is good enough and white gets a clear advantage. If you want better detail contact me and I will show you several lines or look at the lines yourself. Move 27.Kh2! looks good. Rxe1 also wins but Kh2 is very tricky. I did check with a engine to see what is better. The comp liked Rxe1 but showed that Kh2 wins just the same.(Rxe1 IS BETTER but Kh2 wins in style  ) I would play Rxe1 as well but come on. Humanity begs for Kh2. I have decided that I will try to say what everyone has to improve when I look at their game put here. Here is what you have to improve:

1.Your tactics look good but they could be sharper

2.From reading your annotions and looking at the game I recamend learning how to use pieces. What I mean is that you played well but is you had played with a little more piece harmony you could put 100 rating points on. As it is I am surprised that you ado not have 1700 to low 1800 USCF rating.

If you want contact me and I can post blogs on some stunning games played by the polgars. I have the book by lazlo polgar that has over 5,000 puzzles. I believe that if I send you a message each day (hopefully) with a puzzle from a section in this book your piece play will improve. When I get a title (notice I said when) i will coach for pay but for now I will just help people for free :) 

Once again Thanks for the support! Tell me if the analysis was helpfull please. I would love to know! 

Have a great day everyone!

Good! I see you know opening theory. I personally do not like the wiener variation in the french defence(I think thats how it is spelled) I like the tarrasch variation but everyone has their view. If you have not watched videos on the wiener then do so. There is one line that is worth knowing. Nxf6 doesn't llok right. I understand your choice but keep this in mind. After move 5.Bg5 Be7 white can even play move 6. Nxf6. If 6.Bxf6 then 7.Bxf6! and if gxf6 then Bh6! White doesn't retreat the bishop. In most french lines white tries to trade thier dark bishop for blacks strong bishop(thier dark bishop) leaving them with a good bishop on f1 versus the bad bishop on c8. Then a simple plan would be trade the queens and the knights and come to a endgame where you have a good bishop against a bad bishop. Watch GM meliks videos on restricting pieces and GM bojkovs videos on empty bishops. You can find these in the intermediate study plan strategy section 4. I am only telling you YOUR mistakes and ideas. There is no use in telling you where your opponent needs to improve. You say you dont mind isolated pawns. I believe IM daniel rensch has some good videos on isolated queen pawns that you would like. I like move 10.Re1! It is a natural move that has no obvious draw back. The annotions are nice becasue I can see what you were thinking. Move 15.Bh6 is okay. The plan is good but there are better ways to get the c1 bishop to e5. Move 15. Bg5 is tricky with the idea Bxh7! For example Move 15. for black could be b6 trying to play Bb7. Then we see 16.Bxh7! Qxd1 17.Rxd1 and then if Rxh7? White plays Rd8# and if on move 15 plays Bd7 instead we see Bf6 and then Be5. This is better because it is vicous but there is one better move. I showed 15.Bg5 because I love tactics and I couldn't resist showing it but even stronger is move 15.Qg4!! I know it looks like black gets somthing with 15.e5 creating a discovered attck on the queen but then 16.Qg7! attacking the rook on h8 and the pawn on e5. No response is good enough and white gets a clear advantage. If you want better detail contact me and I will show you several lines or look at the lines yourself. Move 27.Kh2! looks good. Rxe1 also wins but Kh2 is very tricky. I did check with a engine to see what is better. The comp liked Rxe1 but showed that Kh2 wins just the same.(Rxe1 IS BETTER but Kh2 wins in style  ) I would play Rxe1 as well but come on. Humanity begs for Kh2. I have decided that I will try to say what everyone has to improve when I look at their game put here. Here is what you have to improve:

1.Your tactics look good but they could be sharper

2.From reading your annotions and looking at the game I recamend learning how to use pieces. What I mean is that you played well but is you had played with a little more piece harmony you could put 100 rating points on. As it is I am surprised that you ado not have 1700 to low 1800 USCF rating.

If you want contact me and I can post blogs on some stunning games played by the polgars. I have the book by lazlo polgar that has over 5,000 puzzles. I believe that if I send you a message each day (hopefully) with a puzzle from a section in this book your piece play will improve. When I get a title (notice I said when) i will coach for pay but for now I will just help people for free :) 

Once again Thanks for the support! Tell me if the analysis was helpfull please. I would love to know! 

Have a great day everyone!

You are doing a great job. I find your insights on games very educational. Thank you.

Yes when I have more time I will help.

Dear Capt_R3x,

Do you want me to analyse the game that the link leads to?

Yes when I have more time I will help.

Dear Capt_R3x,

Do you want me to analyse the game that the link leads to?