Great Analysis by chess.com engine

I blundered while checkmating

This happened with me as well

What was the game link?

You fell for the Patzer's Blunder Mate with more than 1 Queen? haha

Yeah, that´s funny!

I... what? why did

why does it care how you mst

mate* dumb phone

when you listen to GM's discuss mating and mating nets etc it's noticeable that possessing an artistic flair appeals to them. Sometimes they'll call a move 'ugly' when I'm thinking 'Gods that was a genius move'. it may have been effective but it wasn't the most elegant apparently. whether the engines nowadays have developed an humanesque understanding of flair and elan is debatable and possibly rather frightening lol. checkmate is checkmate though. handing out blunders for winning the game outright seems insane

"Great Analysis by chess.com engine"

No such thing.

<<when you listen to GM's discuss mating and mating nets etc it's noticeable that possessing an artistic flair appeals to them. Sometimes they'll call a move 'ugly'>>

That's pretentious. It isn't their business to condemn an effective move as unartistic. In reality, an "ugly" move is not a move that's effective. It's another move that SEEMS to do the job but which has drawbacks. Therefore an "ugly" move is one that a good chess player would try to avoid if at all possible.

are you bragging here that you had two options to checkmate your opponent maybe that was because they were 1400 points lower than you.

come and play against me and you will get mated by move 4

Hola muy bueno

You play for Scholar's Mate? That opening is terrible.