You did a decent analysis of your games.
Don't sell youself short. By your blitz rating of 1107, you are better than more than half the players here.
Help with Analysis please?
Sort:
hahaha well 95% of ACTIVE players are probably better.
Najdorfian wrote:
notmtwain wrote:
You did a decent analysis of your games.
Don't sell youself short. By your blitz rating of 1107, you are better than more than half the players here.
I find this hard to believe.
What's hard to believe? You can check it out yourself:
http://www.chess.com/livechess/players
They have data for bullet, blitz, standard, online and chess960 players.
I seem to be playing c3 Sicilian now as it still gives me a strong pawn center. It has straight forward ideas.
In your analysis of the first game you should at least look into 11. Nxd5 cxd5 12. Qxd5, I think black could defend himself better in the 11. Bxe5 line by playing Qd6 (not allowing the queen into the game).
The biggest mistake I can see in the second game is that you attempt to win the game using only your queen and knight. Instead of starting aggressive actions with your queen on move 9 you need to play d3 and get your bishop out (irregardless of whether there are tactics on f3 or not).
Agreed attacking with as many units as u can increase
Jan 12, 2026
0
#8
My analysis is conceptual, not whatever the engine says.
The first game is very well played. What you can learn from it is that g3 doesn’t seem like a good move. Once you threaten the queen with Bf4, the queen just moves and you don’t really gain anything, but you have weakened the light squares around your castled king (the bishop is not on g2) and you allow Black a breaking point with h5–h4.
In the second game, leaving the blunder aside, something similar happens. You allow your castled position to be broken; after Bxf3, the queen’s entry is deadly. I think Qc4 didn’t strike you as a big mistake, but in my view it’s the worst move of the game, because even if you don’t drop any material, Black’s play becomes very simple, and at this level that is more important than losing a piece in one move. Also, with practice you will reduce your blunders, but the concept—once you understand it—is yours forever.
Impaler_Messmer wrote:
My analysis is conceptual, not whatever the engine says.
The first game is very well played.
...11 years ago.
how is 1300 elo fighting 600 elo isnt it unfair
Jan 12, 2026
0
#11
magipi escribió:
Impaler_Messmer wrote:
My analysis is conceptual, not whatever the engine says.
The first game is very well played.
...11 years ago.
Hahaha I saw only the date of kaissyxxl. I'm Stupid lol
In game 1 you strengthen his centre by 8.Nxc6 and then play the awful g3 move. Why did you play g3? Why not develop? You shoukld probably have played d3 and not d4. It's just an accumulation of mistakes against a stronger player. Learn to make your moves more useful.
In the second game you are better out of the opening. You waste 2 Q moves moving your Q to a bad square and allow him to smash your K position. You should play d3, obviously. And probably the N on b1 should go to d2. to support the Nf3.
The games are old. This info is for others.
About what you are, or a little higher. 700 to 800.
You could have played 9.Qh5 and it's mate in 1.
Jan 12, 2026
0
#16
كتب Optimissed:
About what you are, or a little higher. 700 to 800.
You could have played 9.Qh5 and it's mate in 1.
yea I see
I've been watching some of NM Aww-Rats' videos and he says that the key to improvement is to learn from your own games. Many other people have said going over your games with a stronger player is key to becoming a stronger player. Considering my rating, I'd reckon 95% of members on this site count as stronger players, so I was wondering if I could get some help analysing my games? I've posted 2 below. Thanks in advance