How does Game Report define Blunders, Mistakes, and Inaccuracies?
Sort:
I can only imagine it’s the computer making the decisions. Remember, these things can play 25+ moves ahead on both sides and make millions of calculations per second. It confuses me too but a computer can see into the future, so to speak. What might be an inaccuracy in game A may be a blunder in game 2. Depending on the positions of the pieces I’d say.
Where at a point (thanks to databases and ever increasing data sets) than a computer can estimate your chance of winning based on the first move you take. Or rather according to the dataset, what your chances of winning are etc.
Blows my mind.
Where at a point (thanks to databases and ever increasing data sets) than a computer can estimate your chance of winning based on the first move you take. Or rather according to the dataset, what your chances of winning are etc.
Blows my mind.
Jul 5, 2021
0
#4
https://support.chess.com/article/364-how-does-the-game-report-analysis-work
This will let you know what they look for
Title says it all. In this game a piece hung, or 400+ centipawn loss, was only a mistake, but in other games, I've seen less defined as a blunder. It also seems like even if you're down a lot, if you stumble into a forced mate, the game report defines it as a blunder.