how is it blunder... isnt it checkmate if they take the rook.... wth is this
How is it blunder



Let's stop for a moment and admire how useless and bad Game review is. White loses the rook, and Game review says so, but there's literally no way to find out how... unless you leave Game review and go to Analysis.
I never understood (and never will) how can people use Game review and claim that "it's useful for low rated players because it explains what is going on". Hell no. Quite the opposite.

After g6,
QH3 ITS NOT THAT HARD STOCKFISH
After qh3, qxh7#
It's hard to figure out what you were thinking there. Did you want to take your own rook? Or the black knight? Anyhow, it's not mate.

After g6,
QH3 ITS NOT THAT HARD STOCKFISH
After qh3, qxh7#
It's hard to figure out what you were thinking there. Did you want to take your own rook? Or the black knight? Anyhow, it's not mate.
The pawn blocks the bishop from helping to kill rook 🤯

After g6,
QH3 ITS NOT THAT HARD STOCKFISH
After qh3, qxh7#
It's hard to figure out what you were thinking there. Did you want to take your own rook? Or the black knight? Anyhow, it's not mate.
The knight takes the rook, no?

After g6,
QH3 ITS NOT THAT HARD STOCKFISH
After qh3, qxh7#
It's hard to figure out what you were thinking there. Did you want to take your own rook? Or the black knight? Anyhow, it's not mate.
The knight takes the rook, no?
Okay, so 2. Qh3 Nxh7 3. Qxh7+ Kxh7. The g6 pawn is still there.
Next time you should try to double-check your calculations before you start insulting Stockfish.