I feel like im pretty good at chess, but my rating is 400

Sort:
EscherehcsE

Well, when you two finish your pointless argument, let me know. Until then, I'll just unfollow the thread.

xor_eax_eax05
RespektMyAuthoritah wrote:
xor_eax_eax05 wrote:
RespektMyAuthoritah wrote:
xor_eax_eax05 wrote:
RespektMyAuthoritah wrote:
Ilampozhil25 wrote:

if someone is making an argument which goes wrong somewhere and you actually want to help them

explain where they are going wrong

the whole accuracy stuff is correct (from xor eax)

but erica and respekt are attacking that when they should atleast be attacking the "thus i am 1500" point

and personal attacks are just stupid

all of this can be generalised to any fight about any topic

so ratings shaming me would be logically useless

Na don't try to change history. He was the one who addressed me I wasn't even talking to him and he was the one that started with the personal attacks. But yea you're right this argument is stupid. He just got me mad with his dumb comments

Stop lying, everyone can read my initial reply to your comment at comment #52, and your reply to me on comment #55.

I explained something basic anyone who has analysed a game with an engine learns, and you just raged-attacked me for even daring to reply to your beloved titled player who came to the thread just to troll people and left.

I guess you are 1300 elo at lying too...

Telling you that you have a cognitive bias known as dunning-kruger is an observation not an attack

Your "Master" came to the thread to troll and said something incredibly stupid, which can be proved with statistics - when someone under 900 elo plays a game at 20, 30 centipawn loss, it's not "blunder after blunder after blunder" and a sign of doing absolutely everything wrong. Else the engine would not give out such a good accuracy rating for them since the point of comparison is against the engine's best move and the other player's move.

I clearly explained how it worked and all you did was say I was claiming to be better than a Master - which I never said - and accused me of drunning-kruger as an insult, when all I mentioned about centipawns etc., is true. Zero arguments to my reply, just a personal attack.

So yes yours was a personal attack, so dont come crying you are being victimised.

I respect titled players. I know how difficult it is to achieve what they have so I show respect. I listen to stronger players than me, I did that when I first started and still do to this day. I am humble enough to understand that there's a reason why someone who is stronger than me are where they are and I don't come up with excuses to make myself feel better. You on the other hand think you know better than everyone else. You've tried to downplay like 3 people's abilities all who happen to be better than you and you come up with all sort of excuses to hide your flaws. And no it was just an observation, just because the truth hurts your fragile ego doesn't make it a personal attack

And you keep going on and on.

I dont respect titled players when they come to troll. Im not like you. I dont glorify people and I dont put them on a pedestal. Many people do that, with sportsmen, artists, etc. I think Nakamura is garbage person, for example, and that his only skill is chess, even when he's a FIDE 2800 GM. He seems quite stupid at great deal of other things.

I was very respectful when I replied to the Master and I clearly pointed out why his comment was trollish. You take disagreement as disrespect because you are toxic and you totally have to come here to defend the honour of your beloved titled player.

So obviously you had to butt in and full rage instead of countering my argument. Something you have not even done yet. What I said is correct, even if you dont like a non-titled player saying it. If you had ever gone through your games with engines you'd CLEARLY know something so obvious.

And yes im going to downplay the abilities of 3 trolls who come here with personal attacks and then I go look at their profiles and I see that one is 1300 in long time controls, and the other is like 1700 in rapid and 700 in blitz but does not believe me when I say there's a huge gap in my skill in long time controls against short time controls - yet their gap between two time controls is even higher than mine.

McLovin0723

Stop arguing. I am just so done with this worthless fighting. I did not create this for endless and worthless fighting on who should shut up. I asked for genuine advice. Some of which I got. From various people who messaged me privately and posted good advice on here, for example: someone suggested a counting article. Very helpful. From the few helpful people in here, I have increased my rating by 81 and beat a 700 today. Thank you to the people who did it. 

 

BUT STOP ARGUING. I. DONT. CARE.

Kyobir
McLovin0723 wrote:

Stop arguing. I am just so done with this worthless fighting. I did not create this for endless and worthless fighting on who should shut up. I asked for genuine advice. Some of which I got. From various people who messaged me privately and posted good advice on here, for example: someone suggested a counting article. Very helpful. From the few helpful people in here, I have increased my rating by 81 and beat a 700 today. Thank you to the people who did it. 

 

BUT STOP ARGUING. I. DONT. CARE.

i also beat a 700 (aron). Is it really that hard?

McLovin0723

smh

paper_llama
McLovin0723 wrote:

Stop arguing. I am just so done with this worthless fighting. I did not create this for endless and worthless fighting on who should shut up. I asked for genuine advice. Some of which I got. From various people who messaged me privately and posted good advice on here, for example: someone suggested a counting article. Very helpful. From the few helpful people in here, I have increased my rating by 81 and beat a 700 today. Thank you to the people who did it. 

 

BUT STOP ARGUING. I. DONT. CARE.

Click on someone's username and it will open a little window. In the bottom right of that  click "more." Now click "block." They wont be able to post in your topic while blocked.

After 24 or 48 hours use this link to unblock them https://www.chess.com/settings/blocking

After 1-2 days they'll have lost interest in their argument and wont be arguing here anymore. By unblocking them they can post in your future topics (or even in this one and they'll be more likely to stay on topic).

 

McLovin0723

Thanks man, thats helpful. 

7homa5123
Don't think too much about your rating, I got stuck at around 500 when I started off, then I started to understand the game better and quickly rose to 800 and I'm still going up

 

jairusp

i was making an auto clicker

Brooksvillechess

lmao

so relevant and on topic im impressed

Brooksvillechess

cool though

jairusp

or atleast it should

Brooksvillechess

wow nice

pk83777
i totally agree.
McLovin0723

Lets talk about chess again.

hortoncool

That’s me!

 

xor_eax_eax05

@RespektMyAuthoritah

Stop sending me private messages you 1300 you.

Kyobir
xor_eax_eax05 wrote:

@RespektMyAuthoritah

Stop sending me private messages you 1300 you.

The person you pinged has a daily score of 1300 (everything else is 2000+). Just because you outperform [insert third person gender neutral singular pronoun here] in one category doesn't mean you're better than them overall.

xor_eax_eax05
Kyobir wrote:
xor_eax_eax05 wrote:

@RespektMyAuthoritah

Stop sending me private messages you 1300 you.

The person you pinged has a daily score of 1300 (everything else is 2000+). Just because you outperform [insert third person gender neutral singular pronoun here] in one category doesn't mean you're better than them overall.

Im not going to go all over this again, just read the previous posts in thread.

He should stop private messaging me and then blocking me so that I cannot reply to him. Seems I struck a nerve he's now obsessed.

McLovin0723

Both of you are getting blocked. This is enough.