Second time I played this "accurately", and I only made ONE inaccuracy!
I only played 2 inaccuracies!!
Sort:
I recently completed my second "perfect" game on lichess, both short and straightforward. They don't mean much, but I'll admit I thought it was kind of neat when I got the first one. And you are entitled to be happy about this. However, it also doesn't mean much; you got so far ahead that some stuff that wasn't called an inaccuracy could have been. For example, what the heck does 20. a4 do besides putting all your pawns on the color of his bishop (generally bad) and allow black to create a permanent weakness on b3 with a5? Whatever the engine says, it is a move that a chess tutor would want to stop and focus on with you.
Played a game I'm fairly happy with today! Ran it through the ol' chess.com engine, and according to it, I only made two inaccuracies the whole game! (Ofc, I only have the ability to depth 18 searches, since premium guys have depth 40 or something, but still super happy!)
What's your guys' best games in terms of accuracy?
(NOTE: I only made 2 inaccuracies here, but all my moves weren't "best", some were "good" and "excellent" only. If ALL my moves were best, I would probs be a GM LOL)