I won a game without moving my king at all. :)

Maybe the question is how long can you play without moving your king and win?  :)

You played 1.c4.. it was a positional game.. but if you had played 1.e4 it would have been another game and your king would have been, in many cases, in danger.. however it was a good game

White's last move was supposed to do what it actually did, intimidate his opponent.  The best thing for white to do afterwards is to march the kingside pawns, starting with h5, irregardless of what the trapped knight does.  From this I could possibly see a promising attack on that wing.  White cannot afford to open the e-file at all. And he's not in a position to do so.  The move was more psychological than rational.  The black knight is trapped, but what would be the response should black move the knight anywhere? 

This is simply a game where white played the man rather than the board. I think that what Lasker had said at one point.  Fischer said to play the board, not the man.  So, this game is different from what most would expect nowadays.

yeah i went back and thought "i should have made the knight sac, it would have at least been fun"

too bad! 

spam

Yes, the latest castling took place on White's 46th move.  It was sometime in the 1980s.

Black shouldn't have resigned.  White might have won the exchange but at the price of exposing his king to a discovered check and giving Black control of a open central file!  White would be left with no real attacking possibilities (except for the possibility of a pawn advance on the kingside) and Black would have gained the initiative.

If I did the analysis right....

Edit:  Actually, after playing through, it looks like Black equalizes his material easily, while maintaining the initiative.

 better for black is 3.BxNc3.bute black plays his bishop back to E7 end dane closing his black bishop in leving u bad bishop the black bishop is just standing dere end dowing nothing.