Nice post!
Knights examples
Sort:
The problem is you were trying to be greedy, you could have left with 1 pawn and the exchange and then you could have left being up 2 pawns but Bc5 was. a blunder because now your bishop is threatened and your opponent is threatening mate, playing aggressively is fun but make sure your king is decently safe first, as soon as your opponent opened the f file you played Ng4, not the best move in my opinion because it reveals your weakest pawn and hangs the g7 pawn, going for threats is nice but try and play more conservative next time
Really good example of how positional weaknesses can become tactical opportunities later in the game. The e3 square became a perfect target once the pawn structure changed, and your knight maneuver showed strong understanding of Silman’s ideas about outposts and minor piece activity. I also agree with your second point — even when a tactic looks winning, calculation still matters. I’ve had similar moments rushing decisions in competitive games and even while trying the latest Royal X Casino app ( https://royalxcasinobet.com/ ), where moving too quickly can completely change the outcome.
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
This is a game played by me and a random opponent after studying through "How to reassess your chess, 4th eddition-" By IM Jeremy Silman. (Specifically the minor pieces and knights part.)
After white plays 10. fxg3 I responded with 10. Ng4, planning to use the weakness of the e3 square against white. White allowed me to take the pawn by playing 11. h3, and after 11. Nxe3 is now loosing the exchange due to a fork.
After the queen moves over to e1 there is another fork although, and moving quickly I had thought that I was crushing here, but white gets counter play with 13. Qf2, and after 13. Nf6 the rook kicks the knight out and black (while still being up 2 according to stockfish) has lost their opportunity to trade a knight for a rook.
Now, with the game explained there are two main things to look at. #1, whites ignorance of the holes in their position. When thinking about knights positionally we see how good a knight can be on the 6th rank, and the hole on e3 that removing whites F pawn made. Being aware of these squares and where you and your opponents pieces can work best at can be game changing.
And secondly, #2 Still calculate even if you think your move Is guaranteed. I spent very little time on 12.. Nxc2 and the many blunders that followed it. It's just a reminder that you can loose your advantage just as fast as you can win it if you are not careful.
Other game reviews to come, message me if you have any specific examples of minor pieces positionally.