Latvian gambit 1994 game - Please Explain!!!!

Sort:
ishcairn

I came across this game while studying the gambit, and I can't for the life of me figure out what Mr. Ruben saw as white that made him resign before the twelfth move.  Anyone see anything that I don't?  12. Qxg4 looks solid to me.  Yes, his queen is in danger, but not lost.  After a little running around, It seems that she can slip the noose from her neck.  Of course, this escape takes place at the cost of development, but I do not believe it merited resigning there!  Help me out!  I'm a lowly peon that apparently doesn't see what a player rated much higher than me did.

sahmuald

am i wrong, or would, next move regardless of what white plays, result in knight to f2, an exchange, and black coming up a queen or perhaps even mate 3 or 4 moves later?

bondiggity

Not if white take the knight, I would definitely think that this would be a plus score for white. Possibly he thought that the knight was defended and then he would definitely lose material and I could see him resigning.

woodencardboard

Well, first of all, the play seems really, really bad. Unless, of coures, the Latvian gambit lines are much more weird than I gave them credit for. I mean, seriously, 11. 0-0??? Kd1 just looks terrible.


Anyway, my guess is that white was worried about the black rook on h8 coming to e8, qxf2, and just a descisive attack in general. Black is incredibly activated compared to white, and his king is trapped in the center, unprotected. So, I guess he just resigned in a really bad position. No definite lines here.

immortalgamer

I think he just blundered!  Or maybe he was late for dinner?

P_U_N

I ran this through rybka for a few moves, it seems white may not definetley be lost, but is 3 pawns down and unless black makes a mistake the game is his.

immortalgamer

I think the point here is we had a GM (or whatever) who blundered or didn't want to fight it out. 

P_U_N

I think he did just blunder and didn't realize he could take the knight, but I think black blundered with the knight move, the fork of the queen and bishop with d5 looks like a better move.

lonewolfmadera

I'm not sure, are these international players?  Could the game be fixed?

ishcairn

11. ...d5 leads to 12. Qd3 and the fork is disarmed, but ...Ng4 is then deadly.  I believe tonydal is entirely correct.  Kudos.  

And thanks to you guys that put the game into resources that I don't have.  I appreciate it =D.

Nilesh021

This was not a game between strong players as demonstrated by move 8 by both players. I have no idea what either of them was thinking.