I'd really appreciate it. =)
My game
Sort:
7.f3? If you want a stonewall opening you can play that but you have just blocked the best sqaure for your knight.
11. Re1. not the queen because he can block with his queen and have a good queen trade.
The rest was decent
your opponent played pretty badly x]
4.e5 would have sent that knight back to g8. Why develop when you can undevelop your opponent? :-)
Any more comments?
Thanks for them so far
May 18, 2009
0
#6
I don't think I can respectfully analyze a game by someone named 'ICWiener'
I chose the name from a Tv show, don't judge me
May 23, 2009
0
#9
ICWIENER wrote:
I chose the name from a Tv show, don't judge me
If you really didn't want to judged then you wouldn't/shouldn't choose an ID like that.
Yes from Futurama, and if you guys were mature enough you wouldn't judge people just from their name(cover). Like the saying: ''Never judge a book by its cover''. Ever heard of it?
May 23, 2009
0
#11
ICWIENER wrote:
Yes from Futurama, and if you guys were mature enough you wouldn't judge people just from their name(cover). Like the saying: ''Never judge a book by its cover''. Ever heard of it?
I didn't judge you. I just thought it was an immature name.
You can not control the way people perceive you. You can only control the way you act.
Whether or not that came from a movie or tv show or whatever. That IS an immature name. I am not judging you I am judging what YOU chose to put up as your handle.
Man we're an uptight lot.
Well then maybe I should create a different account since I never knew people on this site would care that much what I put as my 'handle'.
May 23, 2009
0
#14
You dominated this game. There ain't really much to say, you weren't challenged. You did well though, looking for ways to increase the pressure and expose his/her main weakness - the uncaslted king. You'd be better off posting a lost game - then people can tell you where you went wrong. You've got the beating of this person because they're a few hundred below you.
oh, I don't mind your handle.
10. exd5 was good -- e5 may have been tempting, but I think you're better to open up the position with his King still in the centre and yours safely castled away.
11. Re1 would have been better than Qe1 as you played.
12. Nh4+ to win the pawn with discovered check was good, but I think I might have played Bxg5 here instead, pinning the Knight.
19. Ne4 hangs your Bishop. Be4 was clearly the best move here -- I think you're lucky that your opponent played 19...Qe6 instead of Qb6 sealing your Bishop's fate.
20. Qd2 is a nice idea, but it blocks your bishop -- Qd1 might have been better.
20... Rxa8 is a clear blunder by your opponent that loses the Queen.
The rest is not really worth analysing.
May 23, 2009
0
#16
TheGrobe wrote:
Man we're an uptight lot.
I didn't even care. I was just saying if he was going to put something like that he shouldn't be surprised if someone is offended.
That was unneeded
May 24, 2009
0
#19
mosqutip wrote:
Good news everyone! It's a chess website, calm down.
Says the guy who says I can't respectfully analyze a game by a guy named ICWIENER. lmao. You are something else
I would really appreciate it. =)