Should I consider this a draw? - Chess Forums - Page 7

Akshi1102

Nov 29, 2017

0

#121

White to play and mate . . . - I mean draw.

Rsava

Nov 29, 2017

0

#122

ThrillerFan wrote:

Rsava wrote:

ThrillerFan wrote:

Rsava wrote:

ThrillerFan wrote:

vantangler wrote:

At least some support from FIDE. maybe some encouragement to create interest or something. I think they are too busy being corporate shills to worry about progress... just like Obama.

Hey now you Canadian Moron! Don't go knocking Obama! We only have one idiot in our country, and he's 71 years old with a birthday of June 14th!

I didn't realize you were 71 and that your birthday is July 14th.

Rsava makes moron number 2 in America. Clearly he can't even read! He thinks he's knocking me by claiming I'm 71 (Which I'm not) and born on JULY 14th (I wasn't born in JUNE or JULY - Let's try MAY!) when if you read the message he quoted, if I really were 71 and born July 14th, I wouldn't fit the bill of the Moron of America! If Rsava knew how to read, he'd know that JUNE (what the quoted message says) is not the same thing as JULY (what the clown's message says)!

And this whole response proves I was right. A little typo a d you show your true colors.

What an absolute idiot.

You keep on thinking that! An idiot isn't someone that can maintain over a 2000 rating for thousands of games. An idiot is someone that can even get himself on the board. See for yourself!

Rsava - http://www.uschess.org/msa/MbrDtlMain.php?12663448

ThrillerFan - http://www.uschess.org/msa/MbrDtlMain.php?12663277

Read it and week numbnuts!

Read what and WEEK, idiot? You are such an idiot you can't even spell weep correctly.

You have been a first class pr!ck for years and you will continue to be one until someone cures you of it you idiot. I would be happy to.

Now, go back to mommy's little apron and ask her when you can be an adult, ok, pr!ck.

(P.S. not sure what your silly little links are supposed to show. That I have never played a USCF game? So what, you're still an idiot and a pr!ck, that is proven by your idiotic rants.)

lfPatriotGames

Nov 29, 2017

0

#123

Akshi1102 wrote:

White to play and mate . . . - I mean draw.

Using the words of the original poster rook to e8 might "technically" be considered a win, I can see how he might argue it's a draw. We would have to take the whole game into conseration, including the intent of both players, the rating difference between the players, the potential had rook to e8 not been played, etc. Afterall, black might get two queens and technically win himself. So many unanswered questions to say for sure if rook to e8 would really be a win.

TameLava

Nov 29, 2017

0

#124

Please be nice! I don't care if you think that he is a "prick" but be the bigger man!

TameLava

Nov 29, 2017

0

#125

"man"

Akshi1102

Nov 29, 2017

0

#126

YOU LOST

BeepBeepImA747

Nov 29, 2017

0

#127

I think FIDE should actually award 2 points to the loser in such cases, as the supposed loser is obviously the highly superior chessian and the supposed winner, had he been slightly less lucky, would have been crushed into oblivion.

corvidmaster

Nov 29, 2017

0

#128

My bad. IfPatriotGames is correct. Irregardless is a word. Though a dubious word at that. It is there because of its common useage. The dictionary does recommend not using it. I learned something new and that is a good thing. Thanks IfPatriotGames.

vantangler

Nov 29, 2017

0

#129

Akshi1102 wrote:

White to play and mate . . . - I mean draw.

A draw could still be forced in this instance....if:

And that looks pretty droorish to me.

TameLava

Nov 29, 2017

0

#130

If it wasn't white to play? Like exactly not what it said in the instructions?

Akshi1102

Nov 29, 2017

0

#131

vantangler wrote:

Akshi1102 wrote:

White to play and mate . . . - I mean draw.

A draw could still be forced in this instance....if:

And that looks pretty droorish to me.

Firstly white could play Re7 on move 2. Or if he misses that he can capture on g2 on move 13. And it was white to move. So in summary, you can't read or can't play chess. Also, a forced draw means that every move your opponent plays can only evoke one response from you. Stop using the word incorrectly you fop

vantangler

Nov 29, 2017

0

#132

oh. my bad. didnt see that it was white to move.

but if it was black to move, it would certainly be different outcome!

Akshi1102

Nov 29, 2017

0

#133

vantangler wrote:

oh. my bad. didnt see that it was white to move.

but if it was black to move, it would certainly be different outcome!

Run an engine (if you know what that is). White is winning even if it is blue to move

vantangler

Nov 29, 2017

0

#134

@Akshi. I stand corrected. Your right, sorry for the confusion!

Actually, another thing i noticed, is that its almost like a classic Lucina position if black were to move.

lfPatriotGames

Nov 29, 2017

0

#135

Anonymous_Official wrote:

A draw is simply a compromise. Never compromise. Not even in the face of Armageddon.

You aren't married, are you. Compromise is sometimes difficult but necessary. Finding a draw where it doesn't seem possible might be just as difficult.

Akshi1102

Nov 29, 2017

0

#136

vantangler wrote:

@Akshi. I stand corrected. Your right, sorry for the confusion!

Actually, another thing i noticed, is that its almost like a classic Lucina position if black were to move.

This is a classic Lucena Position

Fuxino

Nov 30, 2017

0

#137

vantangler wrote:

As I said before. I guess you had to be there. There are some who would agree that the true outcome of this game is debatable.

No need to "be there": he checkmated you, he won. That's how chess works. Nothing debatable here.

JayeshSinhaChess

Jan 6, 2018

0

#138

Why stop there? Consider it a win

DrChesspain

Jan 6, 2018

0

#139

vantangler wrote:

At least I'm challenging the system.

Fight the Pawn Power!