Stupid, stupid, stupid!
Sort:
ouch
You weren't playing terrible just a screw up on that last move. Also shouldnt those numbers at top read 0-1 if you were black?
wjones4 wrote: ouch
The exact word I used. Interesting complications getting to the final position where I believe you had won a piece and the initiative.
24)Qg4 RxBb7
25)RxRb7 BxRb7
26)Nh5 Ng6 and I think his best shot is 27)Bf6 and hoping you'll take it.
I think the game should have started snowballing to your advantage about then.
camdawg7 wrote: You weren't playing terrible just a screw up on that last move. Also shouldnt those numbers at top read 0-1 if you were black?
??? no... they shouldh't. It doesn't matter who he was. Black lost, white won, and that is always marked as 1-0
Bio si bolji dosta, vidi se. Jedina figura koju ne treba pomjeriti bio je skakac. Ali desava se. Kad ne budes pravio takve greske postaces jako dobar.
Pozdrav W.
Mar 24, 2008
0
#7
After 2. d3?, dxe4 should have been played for a 1 pawn advantage (dxe4, whatever move, then exd3) or a centralised king (dxe4, dxe4, Qxd1+, Kxd1)
3.d4 was an interesting idea but even better was Nc6 or f6, compare your position to the nimzowitch
1.d4 - 1. Nc3 - 2.d4 - 1. d5 - 3. e5.
You both missed a queenside flanchetto (for you) and a kingside (for them)
Interesting while his pawn was on e5 was a6.
Prehaps taking d4 at an earlier time before he defended it (although he didn't) might have been wiser.
Those are alll the things i see after a quick scan, could annotate better, but eh... I'm lazy.
MikedaSnipe wrote:
Prehaps taking d4 at an earlier time before he defended it (although he didn't) might have been wiser.
No, I don't think so. If I had gone after d4 sooner with only three pieces covering, Bc3 would put me in a bad position cause I'd be mid attack with 3:4 against me and no way to disengage without trading queens.
When will I stop playing chess when I'm under stress? I never do something like this when I'm relaxed!