Ok. Thanks. Just sent you a trophy.
The most interesting game of chess was played here in chess.com !! 💥
Sort:
wirebolt wrote:
Ok. Thanks. Just sent you a trophy.
Tks. I sent you another trophy because you sent me a trophy.
With a bigger time control, I am playing BETTER !!
The game below is another one with 3 days per move.
I could manage a crushing attack even if I played a boring ECO opening.
GREAT !!! I bet Magnus is enjoying a lot this game ( I am pretty sure Magnus has been analysing all my games).
Based on that game you are the King of traps fineries (finery)! Not patzers.
C'moon jackfast? Are you taking good humour seriously?!
petrikeckman wrote:
C'moon jackfast? Are you taking good humour seriously?!
I am pretty sure JACKFAST is an account owned by ANAND or KRAMNIK or NAKAMURA. They are afraid I become a GM then crush them in FIDE tournaments. It is quite compreensible.
Dumbness has nothing to do with chess. You can be GM and still dump and you could know nothing about chess but be a clever guy.
petrikeckman wrote:
Based on that game you are the King of traps fineries (finery)! Not patzers.
Then I will claim another title for me: THE KING OF TRAPS!
Later I will consolidate both titles in one: THE KING OF TRAPS FOR PATZERS!!
jackfast wrote:
Marco always says that the top GM games are boring. That is simply because he is too dumb to understand them.
Anand is a patzer. He missed a clear checkmate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yzvtdcx9YiM
And cleverness and dumpness are not absolutely indicator of people's value. Wisdom is more important.
jackfast wrote:
But tell me, was that a boring game?
You told me to get an engine to analyse my games. Ok, that is your opinion.
Then I tell you to get a dictionary to understande what is a boring game.
http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/bored
feeling impatient or dissatisfied, because you are not interested in something or because you have nothing to do. If you want to say you are extremely bored, you can say you are bored stiff/rigid/silly or bored to tears/to death
Oh, I’m so bored!
jackfast wrote:
I usually have no problem with dumb people. I just have a problem with dumb people who have too big of an ego to give themselves names like King of the Patzers.
No, you are wrong !!! I do not have a big ego !
I claimed the title of KING OF THE PATZERS!
If I had a big ego, I did claim the KING OF CHESS PLAYERS OF THE WORLD!
Remember, patzer is a very bad chess player.
However, I trully believe I played (and won) one of the most beautiful games of chess history (see page 1 of this thread, post #7).
See: ONE of the most beautiful games... Not THE MOST beautiful game. Then I do not have a big ego!
Hey, Jackfast, here is the analysis. In both games your opponent blundered, but you played a good attacking game, considering you and you opponent are patzers.
Nov 13, 2015
0
#255
Really dude, it was not that amazing. I mean, nicely done by an 1100, but really better games have been played.
jackfast wrote:
Saying it was one of the most beautiful games in the world is too big of a overstatement. You have a VERY VERY big ego.
Here is my analysis of the first 10 moves which is all I have time for right now.
Ok, that is your opinion about the game. What is the big deal?
I sent you 2 trophies anyway: "don't be too critical" and ""you're funny".
Besides, your ego is bigger than mine.WHY? Because you try to be THE KING OF THE REASON !!!
How dare are you question the KING OF THE PATZERS?!?!
Only a guy with a very big ego dare to question the authority of THE KING OF THE PATZERS!!
YES !!!
Petrike is trying to take my crown off!
There is only ONE KING! ONE KING OF THE PATZERS!! MEEEEEEEEE!
Not after next sunday. It's MEEE! That game is official World Championship of Pratzers Title Organication accepted.
Once I learn how to post games, I might show a checkmate I managed in fourteen moves.
Just do it !!! You can use this thread if you wish.
One trophy sent to you.