Thoughts on this game? I think it was my first game with two brilliances!!
Two brilliances!!
Sort:
Wow
THE ROOOOOK
Jan 20, 2024
0
#4
I used game review on this game, my Stockfish only shows 1 brilliant
ArjuPlayzChess wrote:
I used game review on this game, my Stockfish only shows 1 brilliant
I use maximum depth. Which version do you use?
Jan 20, 2024
0
#6
Stockfish max for own games but for this game I used Stockfish 18
Stockfish 18? Isn't the most recent version Stockfish 16? Is 18 de depth of analysis?
Not at all, it's just a good picture to surprise people. I'm over 1500 FIDE. You can check it in my profile
Jan 21, 2024
0
#10
ArjuPlayzChess wrote:
I used game review on this game, my Stockfish only shows 1 brilliant
The reason probably lies in the fact that Stockfish at greater depth can predict the royal fork...
The_Blue_J wrote:
ArjuPlayzChess wrote:
I used game review on this game, my Stockfish only shows 1 brilliant
The reason probably lies in the fact that Stockfish at greater depth can predict the royal fork...
It's hard to figure out what you mean. Stockfish is extremely good at tactics at all reasonable depths. But this has nothing to do with what counts as "brilliant" on chess.com.
Jan 21, 2024
0
#12
ArjuPlayzChess wrote:
I used game review on this game, my Stockfish only shows 1 brilliant
did you use ipad or computer?
Jan 21, 2024
0
#13
HorsyTheNightmare wrote:
ArjuPlayzChess wrote:
I used game review on this game, my Stockfish only shows 1 brilliant
did you use ipad or computer?
iPad.
also for everyone wondering I think Stockfish 20 is max
Im on maximum, and it considers Rxb4 a great move. still, great game!!1
Optimissed wrote:
Exactly why is a knight, bishop and pawn for a rook seen as a sacrifice of the rook?
Seems like there's something wrong with their counting ability, at Chess.com.
Even the smallest temporary sacrifices are counted by chess.com's script as a sacrifice. Especially at lower rating levels. If you give up a rook for a piece and win another as a result, that counts.
The goal of chess.com is that a lot of moves should count as a "brilliant move".
