19985 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Hi all ... can anyone tell me if I (Black) could have won this game, and if so, where did I go wrong? And where did I go wrong in not holding the draw? I have the feeling that I pushed the K-side pawns too soon, or in the wrong order. The fun starts at move 43. Thanks for your help!
i feel that on move 51 you should have attackes the b pawn
I think 55. ...h5 would have allowed you to hold the draw for black. This is because you could then play g4 at any time for the draw.
Thanks to you both. I sent the game in for analysis and you´re both right; 51 ... Kd5 was better. And the losing blunder at the end was 55... h6 instead of h5.
sorry, i thought you where white :P
5...Bxe3 isn't great (it opens the f-file, and white gets a pawn control over f4 and d4) (the doubled pawns are nothing to be afraid of here).
8...a6 is useless.
after the knight vs. bishop trade that opens the a file, 11...b5 makes a weakness (the a pawn).
14...Rab8 ? loses a pawn, the fact that the knight moved to a dubious square allowed ...Bc8. Generally, the c8-h3 diagonal seems more attractive to me for the bishop, with the idea of a later ...f5.
17...d5, however interesting, does not fight for the a-file. The fact that White did not castle and thus had one rook out of play made that black could have contested the file by 17...Qd8 or 17...Qe8 though if White castles immediately, Black won't take the file.
19...Ne3 ?? jumps into the enemy's camp when the four squares behind the knight are under pawn control, which should be done with much caution - here it loses the knight.
From there, White has a safe win with one more knight, especially after you traded the queens by 23...Qxd2. (...Qc5+ lost too, but gave far more chances for White to blunder into a queen fork or a checkmate.)
31...b3 gives the pawn.
On move 38, you miraculously recover the knight, after what it should be a draw : the Black king attacks the too much forward e5 pawn and the rook cuts the king on the 3d rank, after what Black has 3 vs. 2 on the kingside vs. a passer on the other side.
42...Rxe5 goes into a lost pawn endgame, although White's king should have rushed to the kingside instead of accompaniing his pawn.
As the previous poster said, Black should probably be able to hold a draw by NOT taking on e5. The king and pawn endgame is easily won for white, due to the outside passed b-pawn, but white totally mishandled it.
Before that there's no question, white was a knight up (which he blundered).
O, I did my post wrongly, didn't I. oops. Let me see if I can fix it....
f3 was probaly better than f4.
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!