its a very interesting position, now im trying to figure out what black should do if white doesnt take the knight with the king :)
What is and what should never be
Sort:
Wow! I didn't spot that at all, I just thought, Ng3 fxg3 and that's it! Well I guess it just reinforces the point, If only I'd played that!
oh crap, i messed up the edits >.<
here is the position again :P
here is the position again :P
i just dont know what happens when black doesnt take the knight.
aaaaah i messed up again, dont mind the pawn on c7, it isn't supposed to be there :P
Mar 14, 2009
0
#5
why should we commit on blitz games. blitz games are supposed to be fast and all blunders are not taken advantage off
Mar 14, 2009
0
#7
tonydal wrote:
I'm a bit confused by all these diagrams. Yes, 19... Ng3+ does win the exchange. You have to be very careful about White's one large threat though. For example, in the first position, after 4... Qxf4 (you have the board--and coordinates--reversed) White has 5 Qb8+ Bc8 6 Be6 and in order to try to win Black has to resort to 6... Bf8 to save his rook--and king (6... Bh4 7 Qxc8+ Ke7 8 Qd7+ Kf6? 9 Qf7+ Kg5 10 Qxg7+ Kh5 11 g4+ and mate next move). It doesn't look especially promising for him.
Black had better though: 3... Rf8 (threatening mate in 2) and on 4 h3 Bh4 threatens mate in 3 (as well as giving Black's king some much-needed air). If Black played 4... Bxh3 there btw he is still stymied by 5 Qb8+ Bc8 6 Be6 (6... Qh4+ 7 Bh3).
THIS IS A BLITZ GAME NOT A TOURNAMENT GAME OR OTB ...SO WHAT IS WITH THE DEEP VARIATIONS GIVING FOR THE POSITION. I REPEAT IT WAS A BLITZ GAME
quny wrote:
THIS IS A BLITZ GAME NOT A TOURNAMENT GAME OR OTB ...SO WHAT IS WITH THE DEEP VARIATIONS GIVING FOR THE POSITION. I REPEAT IT WAS A BLITZ GAME
yankees fans...
TNziggy0076 wrote:
quny wrote:
THIS IS A BLITZ GAME NOT A TOURNAMENT GAME OR OTB ...SO WHAT IS WITH THE DEEP VARIATIONS GIVING FOR THE POSITION. I REPEAT IT WAS A BLITZ GAME
yankees fans...
My thoughts, exactly. Go Cards, btw!! 
Mar 14, 2009
0
#11
damn right im still mad about 2004 thats why i had to let it go. same with blitz games
all im saying is why analyzie a blitz game ? for the puropose of the same position as a more time control game. I understand what your are doing. But do u study your blitz games nooo. Blitz to me are played on instinst. Opionion is like a belly-button everybody got one. studying blitz games are a waste of time, we will just be hurting our games if we did (just my belly-button)
Thanks for all your comments gentlemen. To answer a few queries, this was an 11|5 game. I must say I completely agree with NM tonydal, any interesting postition is worth taking a look at because there may well be something to learn from it. In this case, under time constraints I was not bold enough to take the pawn on f2 with my Rook (I APOLOGISE ONCE MORE FOR REVERSED CO-ORDINATES) but now I have learnt that in a blitz game it is worth looking a little into those seemingly illogical lines because some of them can yield a result! I was so preoccupied with the fact that I didn't think I had enough material to force a mate or a successful attack that I played an awful passive move that led to my downfall!
Ever had one of those moments where you think; "Oh God! If only I'd played that!" Well, here's a blitz game where I experienced that exact feeling, after going up a piece, I didn't play sufficiently aggressively to maintain my advantage... here's how it started