What would your plans be for black in this position?

Sort:
nTzT

Position arose from:
Queen's Gambit Declined: Cambridge Springs, Capablanca Variation
07a48f08bc856537dd3a1208ec3a7c1b.png

What are your medium- and long-term plans for black? Perhaps for white as well. Curious since the engine didn't like what I did. Posted it as an image on purpose. Don't put it in the engine. Purely positional, no immediate tactics available.

nTzT
little_guinea_pig wrote:

Black's play is definitely on the kingside because the knight is headed towards c5 and if b6 then the c-pawn becomes very weak and I don't see any way to get c5 in. So I would most likely play Bg4 threatening to take and ruin Black's king safety, then push f5-f4 and take on e3 at the right moment. If White takes back with a piece then the f-file is opened for the rooks and Black can play for an attack on the king, if White takes back with the pawn then the e3 pawn is very weak and Black can stack heavy pieces on the e-file to go after it.

(hopefully this isn't dead wrong lol)

That's what I thought while in-game as well and sadly most of those ideas aren't liked by the engine. The f-pawn push is such a common theme in a Carlsbad structure and I did go for it. Bg4 is also not liked by the engine. Giving up the bishop pair to ruin that structure doesn't really benefit black at all since white wants to play on the queenside anyways and I don't think there's a way to really attack white's kingside. The engine prefers Qf3, Re8 or Rb8. It actually prefers playing on the queenside after that.

Steven-ODonoghue

Yeah, it's clear black wants to play on the kingside while white expands on the queenside... An immediate idea that comes to my mind would be to play ...f5. Either immideately or after ...Bg4. This prevents white from ever playing e4 so black can focus on his kingside play without the centre blowing up. (Bishop on d6 is a strong attacker). ...f5 also allows a rooklift from f6-h6 ( which would immediately threaten Bxh2+ winning) and in some positions the queen can attack from d8-e8-h4 or d8-e8-g6. 

Others may suggest calmer plans but ...f5 is what gets my attention.

nTzT
Steven-ODonoghue wrote:

Yeah, it's clear black wants to play on the kingside while white expands on the queenside... An immediate idea that comes to my mind would be to play ...f5. Either immideately or after ...Bg4. This prevents white from ever playing e4 so black can focus on his kingside play without the centre blowing up. (Bishop on d6 is a strong attacker). ...f5 also allows a rooklift from f6-h6 ( which would immediately threaten Bxh2+ winning) and in some positions the queen can attack from d8-e8-h4 or d8-e8-g6. 

Others may suggest calmer plans but ...f5 is what gets my attention.

Really appreciate you guys from replying, makes me feel better for playing f5 in-game and getting a big fat "?" from the engine.

nTzT

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/35608618013

 

Steven-ODonoghue

Yeah, engines can be bad at understanding how humans play chess sometimes. When I analyse my games in KID type positions it sometimes suggests some weird slow moves on the queenside even though it's obvious blacks play needs to be aimed towards a kingside attack. I know I play unnecesarrily agressively alot, and try to go for attacks in positions where it is not justified... but I think most good players would agree with the decision to attack white in this case. Blacks Bd6 is very strong meanwhile white's only defender is the Nf3 and all his other peices are on the queenside. His attack sort of plays itself.

eric0022
nTzT wrote:
little_guinea_pig wrote:

Black's play is definitely on the kingside because the knight is headed towards c5 and if b6 then the c-pawn becomes very weak and I don't see any way to get c5 in. So I would most likely play Bg4 threatening to take and ruin Black's king safety, then push f5-f4 and take on e3 at the right moment. If White takes back with a piece then the f-file is opened for the rooks and Black can play for an attack on the king, if White takes back with the pawn then the e3 pawn is very weak and Black can stack heavy pieces on the e-file to go after it.

(hopefully this isn't dead wrong lol)

That's what I thought while in-game as well and sadly most of those ideas aren't liked by the engine. The f-pawn push is such a common theme in a Carlsbad structure and I did go for it. Bg4 is also not liked by the engine. Giving up the bishop pair to ruin that structure doesn't really benefit black at all since white wants to play on the queenside anyways and I don't think there's a way to really attack white's kingside. The engine prefers Qf3, Re8 or Rb8. It actually prefers playing on the queenside after that.

 

My candidate moves are Bg4, Qf6 and f5.

 

I would probably go for f5 because I didn't exactly like White pushing e3-e4 at some point later on, but I have to be prepared that e5 will be a great outpost for the f3 knight or the other knight.

ninjaswat

Me: g5!!

OranegJuice

cambridge springs? what's up with the name of some of these openings?

nTzT
OranegJuice wrote:

cambridge springs? what's up with the name of some of these openings?

288cc71f86f8de90b67781ae0ca8756a.png
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen%27s_Gambit_Declined,_Cambridge_Springs_Defense



I'd say this name is completely normal compared to the rat defence and those sorts of names.

BishopTakesH7
OranegJuice wrote:

cambridge springs? what's up with the name of some of these openings?

 

Per Wikipedia: The name derives from a 1904 tournament in Cambridge Springs, Pennsylvania, in which the defense was used several times.

nTzT
BishopTakesH7 wrote:
OranegJuice wrote:

cambridge springs? what's up with the name of some of these openings?

 

Per Wikipedia: The name derives from a 1904 tournament in Cambridge Springs, Pennsylvania, in which the defense was used several times.

haha, I beat you by a second

BishopTakesH7

Lol, we both posted wikipedia at the same time.

GeorgeWyhv14

Queen side pawn storm?

tygxc

White has the better pawn structure, as the c-file is stronger than the e-file. The long term plan for white is to put rooks on the c-file, a knight on c5 and to advance a- and b-pawns to create a weakness on c6.
Black has the bishop's pair. Black will put a rook on e8 and a bishop on f5.
Black has the better chances, but it is about equal.

RAU4ever

I'd say develop and attack on the kingside. I'd like a setup with ... Re8 and ... Qf6, before playing for Bg4. I don't feel white is threatening much, so why not build up first and get our pieces in the attack?

Qxe7checkmate

I'm kinda confused on why white played Na4 instead of b5, but black should probably go for typical carlsbad stuff like f5 f4 ig, maybe Bg4 to take because you still have your dark squared bishop so pretty sure black would be better there because white is just not gonna get Kh1 Rg1 in time, if he defends the knight with the queen, then maybe go Bh5-g6.

Beluga_10002

where game?

Qxe7checkmate

wdym where game? if u mean the position click the "First" button

tygxc

#21
White played Na4 to install the knight as an outpost at c5.
...f5 would make sense if black could install a knight on e4, but the black knights are traded. So black should put his bishop on f5 controlling outpost square e4. Hence no ...f5.
...Bg4 is not the right plan IMHO.