AlekhinesRazor hat geschrieben:
Most likely the engine sees that Black loses less material when Black loses a rook instead of a queen.
Possible.Still weird though.
Why is this move better?
Sort:
I analysed the game too and in my analysis the move exf1=Q is the best move. I think there is no difference. But why is it different in my analysis?
Stonekite wrote: yet the engine shows a slightly higher advantage when promoting to a rook.
Are you sure about this? I am running the analysis right now, and the engine always gives the same evaluation to those 2 moves.
magipi hat geschrieben:
Stonekite wrote: yet the engine shows a slightly higher advantage when promoting to a rook.
Are you sure about this? I am running the analysis right now, and the engine always gives the same evaluation to those 2 moves.
Absolutely sure.My analysis shows 0.4 higher advantage when promoting to a rook.Perhaps your engine is running at a higher depth?
Stonekite wrote:
magipi hat geschrieben:
Stonekite wrote: yet the engine shows a slightly higher advantage when promoting to a rook.
Are you sure about this? I am running the analysis right now, and the engine always gives the same evaluation to those 2 moves.
Absolutely sure.My analysis shows 0.4 higher advantage when promoting to a rook.Perhaps your engine is running at a higher depth?
Every engine I tried shows them as equal a all depths. As they should.
A reasonable explanation that you are looking at a moment when one move is analyzed one half-move deeper than the other. In this case a slight difference may show up but it will equalize when the depths are the same.
So I just