On move 11, White could have still played c5, driving back your bishop and maybe making it harder for you to play e5.
On move 15, are you sure the pawn can't be saved? How about 15...Bxd2 Qxd2 Bf5, and you can't take the knight because it would expose your queen to his rook.
I don't think your move 22 deserves an exclamation point. It's not bad, but all that happens is a bishop/knight trade.
On move 28, you're better off letting him fork you than losing a piece, I think. I'd rather be down rook for knight than knight for nothing. You should have at least considered it.
I would not have initiated a rook exchange on move 30. You're giving him the open file to use with his other rook. Plus you're behind, so you don't exactly want to be trading material for no reason.
On move 35 you say "a6 is a better move because it connects pawns." Actually, a5 is better. You have connected passed pawns - you want to push those as much as possible.
Personally, I would not have resigned at the end... Your king could have got back, and a rook pawn with a knight, while a theoretical win, is not the easiest thing to promote. I'd make him prove he knows how.
I have played a 15 min game and want to hear your comments about it.