Great game.
A real amature queen sac gambit !!!
Sort:
pfren wrote:
Black is winning easily on the final position, and moves 10-14 by both sides are almost all big mistakes.
I won't comment about the first moves, since there are quite a few people who consider playing nonsense in the opening as "fun".
http://www.chesscafe.com/Tim/kibb.htm nuff said.
I am curious however why did black agree to a draw in the final positon ?
chessmaster102 wrote:
I am curious however why did black agree to a draw in the final positon ?
Time trouble.
Haha.
pfren wrote:
chessmaster102 wrote:
http://www.chesscafe.com/Tim/kibb.htm nuff said.
Harding's analyses and suggestions had been trash since the late seventies, when he began writing about chess. I deeply regret having bought a few of his books in the past.
Now that I think about it I've never really heard of any famous books from him is he atleast someone of my level can learn from ?
Say, you don't have a photogra-- er, eidetic memory, do you?
May 18, 2012
0
#10
pfren, Dana McK did extensive analysis and I think his conclusion is that the gambit is indeed sound.
re: "White's gambit is ultimately unsound"
A game played between to players at my local club which I thought was a very creative showdown played by a much lower rated player.